Experiences of parents whose children participated in a longitudinal follow-up study
- PMID: 35393722
- PMCID: PMC9327855
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13473
Experiences of parents whose children participated in a longitudinal follow-up study
Abstract
Background: Long-term follow-up is necessary to understand the impact of perinatal interventions. Exploring parents' motives and experiences in consenting to their children taking part in longitudinal studies and understanding what outcomes are important to families may enhance participation and mitigate the loss to follow-up. As existing evidence is largely based on investigators' perspectives using Western samples, the present pilot study explored parents' perspectives in a multicultural New Zealand context.
Methods: Data were generated using semi-structured interviews with parents whose children had participated in a longitudinal study after neonatal recruitment. Parents' experiences of being part of the study were analysed thematically using an inductive approach.
Results: Parents (n = 16) were generally happy with the outcomes measured. Additionally, parents were interested in lifelong goals such as the impact of parental diabetes. We identified three themes: (1) Facilitators: Research participation was aided by motives and parent and research characteristics such as wishing to help others and straightforward recruitment; (2) Barriers: A hesitancy to participate was due to technical and clinical research aspects, participation burden and cultural barriers, such as complex wording, time commitment and nonindigenous research and (3) Benefits: Children and parents experienced advantages such as the opportunity for education.
Conclusions: Parents reported positive experiences and described the unexpected benefit of increasing families' health knowledge through participation. Improvements for current follow-up studies were identified. Different ethnicities reported different experiences and perspectives, which warrants ongoing research, particularly with indigenous research participants.
Patient or public contribution: No active partnership with parents of patients took place.
Keywords: consumer engagement; enabling factors; indigenous; long-term research; paediatric trial; participant experience; research interests.
© 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Parents' experiences of transition when their infants are discharged from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):123-32. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2287. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571288
-
Determining the benefits and drawbacks of parents using personal connections and social networks for recruitment in research projects: a qualitative study.Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 26;9(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00470-1. Res Involv Engagem. 2023. PMID: 37496063 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring parents' attitudes towards a multicentre cohort study of children with burns injuries: A qualitative interview study.Scars Burn Heal. 2022 Jun 30;8:20595131221098526. doi: 10.1177/20595131221098526. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. Scars Burn Heal. 2022. PMID: 35800295 Free PMC article.
-
Parents' Insights into Pediatric Oncology Phase I Clinical Trials: Experiences from Their Child's Participation.Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021 Jun;37(3):151162. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151162. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021. PMID: 34148742 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Children living with long-term conditions: A meta-aggregation of parental experiences of partnership nursing.J Clin Nurs. 2021 Sep;30(17-18):2611-2633. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15770. Epub 2021 Apr 7. J Clin Nurs. 2021. PMID: 33829591 Review.
Cited by
-
Uncovering systemic barriers related to equity, diversity and inclusion in child health research: a scoping review addressing marginalised communities.BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 17;10(8):e015824. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015824. BMJ Glob Health. 2025. PMID: 40825607 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Braun V, Clarke V, Ranc N. How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In: Vossler A, Moller N, eds. The Counselling and Psychotherapy Research Handbook. SAGE Publications; 2014.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials