Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface
- PMID: 35395344
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104121
Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface
Abstract
Objectives: To test the failure load and failure mode of a novel implant-crown interface specifically designed for the fabrication of fully personalized, abutment-free monolithic zirconia CAD-CAM crowns compared to conventional implant-abutment interfaces involving prefabricated or centrally manufactured abutments for zirconia CAD-CAM crowns.
Methods: Implants (N=48) were divided into groups (n=12) according to different implant-abutment interface designs: (1) internal implant connection with personalized, abutment-free CAD-CAM crowns (Abut-Free-Zr), (2) internal conical connection with customized, centrally manufactured zirconia CAD-CAM abutments (Cen-Abut-Zr), (3) prefabricated titanium base abutments from manufacturer 1 (Ti-Base-1), (4) additional prefabricated titanium base abutments from manufacturer 2 (Ti-Base-2). All specimens were restored with a screw-retained monolithic zirconia CAD-CAM molar crown and subjected to thermomechanical aging (1.200.000 cycles, 49 N, 1.67 Hz, 30° angulation, thermocycling 5-50°C). Static load until failure was applied in a universal testing machine. Failure modes were analyzed descriptively under digital microscope. Mean failure load values were statistically analyzed at a significance level of p<0.05.
Results: All specimens survived thermomechanical aging. The mean failure loads varied between 1332 N (Abut-Free-Zr) and 1601 N (Ti-Base-2), difference being significant between these groups (p<0.05). No differences between the other groups were seen. The predominant failure mode per group was crown fracture above implant connection (Abut-Free-Zr, 75%), abutment fracture below implant neck (Cen-Abut-Zr, 83%), crown fracture leaving an intact abutment (Ti-Base-1/Ti-Base-2 100%).
Conclusions: Implant-crown interface with fully personalized, abutment-free monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia crowns exhibited similar failure loads as conventional implant-abutment interfaces (except group Ti-Base-2) involving CAD-CAM crowns with prefabricated or centrally manufactured abutment.
Clinical significance: The new implant connection simplifies the digital workflow for all-ceramic implant reconstructions. The specific design of the implant-crown interface allows the fabrication of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns both in-house and in-laboratory without the need of a prefabricated abutment or central manufacturing.
Keywords: CAD-CAM; Crown; Dental implants; Monolithic; Personalized; Prosthodontics; Zirconia.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Load-bearing capacity of screw-retained fixed dental prostheses made of monolithic zirconia on different abutment designs and abutment-free implant connection.J Dent. 2025 Feb;153:105561. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105561. Epub 2025 Jan 6. J Dent. 2025. PMID: 39778736
-
Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 September/October;34(5):1091–1097. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7431. Epub 2019 Apr 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019. PMID: 30934031
-
Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1448-55. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012. PMID: 23189296
-
Material and abutment selection for CAD/CAM implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients - A narrative review.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Aug;35(8):984-999. doi: 10.1111/clr.14315. Epub 2024 Jun 12. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024. PMID: 38864592 Review.
-
Network meta-analysis of survival rate and complications in implant-supported single crowns with different abutment materials.J Dent. 2019 Sep;88:103115. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 12. J Dent. 2019. PMID: 30986515 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical and Radiographic Status and PISF Levels of PGE2 Around Cement and Screw Retained Implants.Int Dent J. 2024 Dec;74(6):1378-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.04.026. Epub 2024 Jun 11. Int Dent J. 2024. PMID: 38866672 Free PMC article.
-
One-Piece Monolithic Zirconia Single Tooth Implant-Supported Restorations in the Posterior Region: A 1-Year Prospective Case Series Study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Apr;36(4):460-470. doi: 10.1111/clr.14396. Epub 2024 Dec 23. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025. PMID: 39711513 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous