Conventional vs. triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids. A prospective, randomized trial
- PMID: 3539557
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02555358
Conventional vs. triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids. A prospective, randomized trial
Abstract
Two hundred five patients with symptomatic first- and second-degree hemorrhoids were randomized to receive either conventional rubber band ligation or triple rubber band ligation. In conventional rubber band ligation, the hemorrhoids were ligated at one primary site per session at intervals of four weeks until symptoms were relieved or when all three hemorrhoids were ligated. In triple rubber band ligation, all three primary hemorrhoids were ligated in a single session. After completion of treatment, the patients were examined every three months, or earlier if symptoms recurred. Both methods were effective in the treatment of early hemorrhoids and the incidence of postligation pain and complications was similar. The advantages of having the treatment completed at the initial visit in triple rubber band ligation are obvious. Furthermore, less treatment sessions were required for triple rubber band ligation to control symptoms than for conventional rubber band ligation. Triple rubber band ligation is more cost-effective and therefore is recommended.
Similar articles
-
Triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids: prospective, randomized trial of use of local anesthetic injection.Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Mar;42(3):363-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02236354. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999. PMID: 10223757 Clinical Trial.
-
The hemorrhoid laser procedure technique vs rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatments for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids.Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jun;54(6):693-8. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182112d58. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011. PMID: 21552053 Clinical Trial.
-
[Rubber band ligation in treatment of hemorrhoids: our experience].Clin Ter. 2015;166(4):162-7. doi: 10.7417/CT.2015.1863. Clin Ter. 2015. PMID: 26378752 Clinical Trial. Italian.
-
Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (HAL) vs. Rubber Band Ligation (RBL) for Second- and Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):e79810. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79810. eCollection 2025 Feb. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40161159 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: A guide for complications.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Sep 27;8(9):614-620. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i9.614. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. PMID: 27721924 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Logical clinical decisions in the investigation and management of non-urgent rectal bleeding.Gastroenterol Jpn. 1991 Jul;26 Suppl 3:107-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02779276. Gastroenterol Jpn. 1991. PMID: 1884941
-
Rubber band ligation of symptomatic hemorrhoids: an old solution to an everyday problem.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Aug;36(8):1723-1729. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03900-2. Epub 2021 Mar 10. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 33751210
-
Excisional hemorrhoidal surgery and its effect on anal continence.World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 14;18(30):4059-63. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i30.4059. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22912558 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term result after rubber band ligation for haemorrhoids.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Sep;24(9):1007-10. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0698-y. Epub 2009 Apr 23. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009. PMID: 19387663
-
A Stepwise Proposal for Low-Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease: Injection Sclerotherapy as a First-Line Treatment and Rubber Band Ligation for Persistent Relapses.Front Surg. 2022 Jan 10;8:782800. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.782800. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35083270 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical