Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e056753.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056753.

WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers' perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region: development and mixed-methods validation in six countries

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers' perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region: development and mixed-methods validation in six countries

Emanuelle Pessa Valente et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Develop and validate a WHO Standards-based online questionnaire to measure the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth from the health workers' perspective.

Design: Mixed-methods study.

Setting: Six countries of the WHO European Region.

Participants and methods: The questionnaire is based on lessons learnt in previous studies, and was developed in three sequential phases: (1) WHO Quality Measures were prioritised and content, construct and face validity were assessed through a Delphi involving a multidisciplinary board of experts from 11 countries of the WHO European Region; (2) translation/back translation of the English version was conducted following The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research guidelines; (3) internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability were assessed among 600 health workers in six countries.

Results: The questionnaire included 40 items based on WHO Standards Quality Measures, equally divided into four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, organisational changes due to COVID-19; and its organised in six sections. It was translated/back translated in 12 languages: Bosnian, Croatian, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish. The Cronbach's alpha values were ≥0.70 for each questionnaire section where questions were hypothesised to be interrelated, indicating good internal consistence. Cohen K or Gwet's AC1 values were ≥0.60, suggesting good intrarater reliability, except for one question. Acceptability was good with only 1.70% of health workers requesting minimal changes in question wording.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that the questionnaire has good content, construct, face validity, internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability in six countries of the WHO European Region. Future studies may further explore the questionnaire's use in other countries, and how to translate evidence generated by this tool into policies to improve the QMNC.

Trail registration number: NCT04847336.

Keywords: NEONATOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phases of questionnaire development and multicountry validation.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Every woman every child. Global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents health 2016–2030, 2016. Available: http://www.who.int/life-course/partners/global-strategy/global-strategy-... [Accessed 14 Apr 2021].
    1. United Nations . The Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030). Every Woman Every Child, 2015. Available: https://www.who.int/life-course/partners/global-strategy/globalstrategyr... [Accessed 14 Apr 2021].
    1. The White Ribbon Alliance . Respectful maternity care charter: universal rights of women and newborns, 2021. Available: https://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/rmcresources/ [Accessed 14 Apr 2021].
    1. Graham WJ, Varghese B. Quality, quality, quality: gaps in the continuum of care. Lancet 2012;379:e5–6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62267-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. . The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001847. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data