Physician perspectives of abortion advocacy: findings from a mixed-methods study
- PMID: 35396323
- PMCID: PMC9872227
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201394
Physician perspectives of abortion advocacy: findings from a mixed-methods study
Abstract
Objective: Our aim was to assess physicians' perspectives of what constitutes abortion advocacy and the skills needed to be effective in their efforts to safeguard legal abortion.
Methods: Alumni from a physician training programme for sexual and reproductive health advocacy completed a cross-sectional survey including questions on perceived skills needed for effective advocacy. The research team conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with alumni, based on their level of engagement in advocacy. We present descriptive statistics for survey data and themes identified in the interview data using techniques informed by grounded theory.
Results: Of the survey respondents (n=231), almost a third (28.6%; n=66) felt the most important media skill they learnt was the ability to stay on message. The most important policy skill was communicating effectively with policymakers (47.0%; n=108), followed by distilling evidence for policymakers and laypeople (13.0%; n=30). In the IDIs (n=36), participants reported activities such as media interviews as clear examples of advocacy, but also considered implementing institutional policies and abortion provision to be advocacy. They discussed how individual comfort and capacity for advocacy activities may change over time, given personal and professional considerations. Regardless of the type of activity, physicians valued strategic communication and relationship-building skills.
Conclusions: Based on our findings, training programmes that seek to mobilise physician advocates to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights should work with trainees to create a tailored advocacy plan that fits their personal and professional lives and goals. Regardless of the types of advocacy activities physicians focus on, strategic communication may be central in skills-based training.
Keywords: abortion, induced; family planning policy; health policy; health services accessibility; qualitative research; surveys and questionnaires.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Physician engagement in reproductive health advocacy: findings from a mixed methods evaluation of a leadership and advocacy program.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05410-5. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38689263 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual and Reproductive Health Advocacy Successes, Failures, and Needs in the United States: Perspectives From Key Stakeholders.Health Promot Pract. 2024 Mar;25(2):183-187. doi: 10.1177/15248399221137053. Epub 2022 Nov 23. Health Promot Pract. 2024. PMID: 36419323
-
Physicians and healthcare professionals as advocates for abortion care and reproductive choice.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec 1;34(6):367-372. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000833. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 36342009 Review.
-
The U.S. Global Gag Rule in Ethiopia: a foreign policy challenging domestic sexual and reproductive health and rights gains.Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(Suppl 1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01329-6. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 35698199 Free PMC article.
-
Global progress in abortion advocacy and policy: an assessment of the decade since ICPD.Reprod Health Matters. 2005 May;13(25):88-100. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(05)25168-6. Reprod Health Matters. 2005. PMID: 16035601 Review.
Cited by
-
Physician engagement in reproductive health advocacy: findings from a mixed methods evaluation of a leadership and advocacy program.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05410-5. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38689263 Free PMC article.
-
Organizing Primary Care Clinicians to Expand Reproductive Health Access: A Qualitative Program Evaluation.Fam Med. 2024 Apr;56(4):250-258. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.589091. Epub 2024 Feb 21. Fam Med. 2024. PMID: 38506697 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the health advocacy concept from the perspective of the evolutionary method.Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023 Oct 13;57:e20230170. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0170en. eCollection 2023. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023. PMID: 37882698 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Medical Association . Declaration of professional reponsibility: medicine’s social contract with humanity, 2001. Available: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-03/declaration-professional-r... [Accessed 08 Feb 2022]. - PubMed
-
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education . ACGME common program requirements (residency), 2022. Available: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRResid... [Accessed 08 Feb 2022].
-
- Gallup . Honesty/ethics in professions, 2021. Available: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1654/honesty-ethics-professions.aspx [Accessed 08 Feb 2022].
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical