Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jun;93(6):573-581.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328422. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

Results of the COMPARE trial of Constraint-induced or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Results of the COMPARE trial of Constraint-induced or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia

Miranda L Rose et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: While meta-analyses confirm treatment for chronic post-stroke aphasia is effective, a lack of comparative evidence for different interventions limits prescription accuracy. We investigated whether Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy Plus (CIAT-plus) and/or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy (M-MAT) provided greater therapeutic benefit compared with usual community care and were differentially effective according to baseline aphasia severity.

Methods: We conducted a three-arm, multicentre, parallel group, open-label, blinded endpoint, phase III, randomised-controlled trial. We stratified eligible participants by baseline aphasia on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R-AQ). Groups of three participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 30 hours of CIAT-Plus or M-MAT or to usual care (UC). Primary outcome was change in aphasia severity (WAB-R-AQ) from baseline to therapy completion analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included word retrieval, connected speech, functional communication, multimodal communication, quality of life and costs.

Results: We analysed 201 participants (70 in CIAT-Plus, 70 in M-MAT and 61 in UC). Aphasia severity was not significantly different between groups at postintervention: 1.05 points (95% CI -0.78 to 2.88; p=0.36) UC group vs CIAT-Plus; 1.06 points (95% CI -0.78 to 2.89; p=0.36) UC group vs M-MAT; 0.004 points (95% CI -1.76 to 1.77; p=1.00) CIAT-Plus vs M-MAT. Word retrieval, functional communication and communication-related quality of life were significantly improved following CIAT-Plus and M-MAT. Word retrieval benefits were maintained at 12-week follow-up.

Conclusions: CIAT-Plus and M-MAT were effective for word retrieval, functional communication, and quality of life, while UC was not. Future studies should explore predictive characteristics of responders and impacts of maintenance doses.

Trial registration number: ACTRN 2615000618550.

Keywords: aphasia; randomised trials; rehabilitation; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MLR, LN, DC, LT, EG, MM, TR, DAC, JK and MH were members of the COMPARE steering committee, chaired by MLR.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial timeline. CIAT, constraint-induced aphasia therapy; M-MAT, Multimodality Aphasia Therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT diagram. CETI, Communication Effectiveness Index; CIAT, Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy; CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; SAQOL, Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life; WAB-R-AQ, Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparative mean outcomes measures at baseline, post-intervention and follow-up. CIAT, Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy-Plus; CETI, Communication Effectiveness Index; COMPARE, Constraint-Induced or Multi-Modality Personalised Aphasia Rehabilitation; M-MAT, Multimodality Aphasia Therapy; SAQOL, Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life; WAB-R, Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. Error bars represent standard deviations.

References

    1. Flowers HL, Skoretz SA, Silver FL, et al. Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97:2188–201. 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, et al. Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;10:455–61. 10.1159/000016107 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hilari K, Byng S. Health-Related quality of life in people with severe aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2009;44:193–205. 10.1080/13682820802008820 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis C, Simpson AN, Bonilha H, et al. The one-year attributable cost of poststroke aphasia. Stroke 2012;43:1429–31. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.647339 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:CD000425. 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types