Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;49(7):4671-4681.
doi: 10.1002/mp.15657. Epub 2022 May 5.

Comparative accuracy and resolution assessment of two prototype proton computed tomography scanners

George Dedes  1 , Hubertus Drosten  1 , Stefanie Götz  1 , Jannis Dickmann  1 , Christina Sarosiek  2 , Mark Pankuch  3 , Nils Krah  4 , Simon Rit  4 , Vladimir Bashkirov  5 , Reinhard W Schulte  5 , Robert P Johnson  6 , Katia Parodi  1 , Ethan DeJongh  7 , Guillaume Landry  1   8   9
Affiliations

Comparative accuracy and resolution assessment of two prototype proton computed tomography scanners

George Dedes et al. Med Phys. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Improving the accuracy of relative stopping power (RSP) in proton therapy may allow reducing range margins. Proton computed tomography (pCT) has been shown to provide state-of-the-art RSP accuracy estimation, and various scanner prototypes have recently been built. The different approaches used in scanner design are expected to impact spatial resolution and RSP accuracy.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to perform the first direct comparison, in terms of spatial resolution and RSP accuracy, of two pCT prototype scanners installed at the same facility and by using the same image reconstruction algorithm.

Methods: A phantom containing cylindrical inserts of known RSP was scanned at the phase-II pCT prototype of the U.S. pCT collaboration and at the commercially oriented ProtonVDA scanner. Following distance-driven binning filtered backprojection reconstruction, the radial edge spread function of high-density inserts was used to estimate the spatial resolution. RSP accuracy was evaluated by the mean absolute percent error (MAPE) over the inserts. No direct imaging dose estimation was possible, which prevented a comparison of the two scanners in terms of RSP noise.

Results: In terms of RSP accuracy, both scanners achieved the same MAPE of 0.72% when excluding the porous sinus insert from the evaluation. The ProtonVDA scanner reached a better overall MAPE when all inserts and the body of the phantom were accounted for (0.81%), compared to the phase-II scanner (1.14%). The spatial resolution with the phase-II scanner was found to be 0.61 lp/mm, while for the ProtonVDA scanner somewhat lower at 0.46 lp/mm.

Conclusions: The comparison between two prototype pCT scanners operated in the same clinical facility showed that they both fulfill the requirement of an RSP accuracy of about 1%. Their spatial resolution performance reflects the different design choices of either a scanner with full tracking capabilities (phase-II) or of a more compact tracker system, which only provides the positions of protons but not their directions (ProtonVDA).

Keywords: RSP; design choices; image quality; proton CT; spatial resolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Paganetti H. Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:R99-R117.
    1. Schneider U, Pedroni E, Lomax A. The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41:111-124.
    1. Yang M, Zhu XR, Park PC, et al. Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:4095-4115.
    1. Landry G, Hua C-H. Current state and future applications of radiological image guidance for particle therapy. Med Phys. 2018;45:e1086-e1095.
    1. Hünemohr N, Krauss B, Tremmel C, Ackermann B, Jäkel O, Greilich S. Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates. Phys Med Biol. 2013;59:83.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources