Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Mar;143(3):1679-1688.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04424-2. Epub 2022 Apr 10.

Cup positioning and its effect on polyethylene wear of vitamin E- and non-vitamin E-supplemented liners in total hip arthroplasty: radiographic outcome at 5-year follow-up

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cup positioning and its effect on polyethylene wear of vitamin E- and non-vitamin E-supplemented liners in total hip arthroplasty: radiographic outcome at 5-year follow-up

Josef Baghdadi et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Aseptic loosening remains a challenging problem after total hip arthroplasty. Accurate cup placement and supplementation of antioxidants in acetabular liners might reduce material failure rates. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the cup position on the wear behaviour of UHMWPE-XE and UHMWPE-X liners in vivo using virtual radiographs.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Clinical data of 372 probands were analyzed. Anteroposterior pelvic X-rays of 324 patients immediately postoperatively and after 1 and 5 years were evaluated by the RayMatch® analysis software regarding cup position and wear behaviour.

Results: Mean cup anteversion was 20.3° (± 7.4) and inclination was 41.9° (± 7.0) postoperatively. 62.3% of all patients had an anteversion and inclination within the Lewinnek safe zone. Anterior and anterolateral approaches led to significantly higher cup anteversion compared to lateral approaches (27.3° ± 5.5; 20.9° ± 7.2; 17.5° ± 6.6; p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Mean anteversion increased to 24.6° (± 8.0) after 1 year (p < 0.001). Only one revision occurred because of implant dislocation. Wear rates from UHMWPE-X and UHMWPE-XE did not differ significantly. Anteversion angles ≥ 25° correlated to increased polyethylene wear (23.7 µm/year ± 12.8 vs. 31.1 µm/year ± 22.8, p = 0.012) and this was amplified when inclination angles were ≥ 50° (23.6 µm/year ± 12.8 vs. 38.0 µm/year ± 22.7, p = 0.062).

Conclusion: Anterior approaches lead to the highest inaccuracy of cup placement, but cup positioning outside the Lewinnek safe zone does not necessarily cause higher dislocation rates. Moreover, mean anteversion increased by approximately four degrees within the first year after operation, which is expected to be functional due to a regularization of pelvic tilt after intervention. Mid-term wear rates of UHMWPE-X and UHMWPE-XE liners are comparable, but steep cup positions lead to significantly increased polyethylene wear. In summary, a re-evaluation of target zones for intraoperative cup positioning might be considered. In the long-term reduced oxidative embrittlement could lead to superior wear behaviour of vitamin E-blended liners.

Keywords: CAD-based wear analysis; Cup placement; Total hip arthroplasty; UHMWPE-XE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Alexander Roth is an employee of Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen. Otherwise the authors declare that they have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Generation of artificial CAD-based radiographs and comparison to the corresponding clinical X-ray image using the RayMatch® technique (Raylytic, Leipzig, Germany)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scattergram of measured postoperative cup anteversion and inclination according to the Lewinnek safe zone (box)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bar graph of measured postoperative cup anteversion depending on the chosen surgical approach
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Bar graph of measured annual wear rate within the first 5 years subject to the postoperatively measured cup position

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370:1508–1519. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meek RM, Allan DB, McPhillips G, Kerr L, Howie CR. Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:9–18. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218754.12311.4a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295–1306. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198264090-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. an analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:442–448. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:19–23. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types