Evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for drug-drug interactions with anticancer drugs; A practical and universal tool for management
- PMID: 35397932
- DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.03.002
Evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for drug-drug interactions with anticancer drugs; A practical and universal tool for management
Abstract
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with anticancer drugs are common and can significantly affect efficacy and toxicity of treatment. Therefore, a Dutch Multidisciplinary Expert group is assessing the clinical significance of DDIs in oncology and provides recommendations for the management of these DDIs. We present an overview of methodology and outcome of an evidence- and consensus-based assessment of DDIs between anticancer drugs and non-anticancer drugs. A literature search was performed through PubMed and EMA and FDA assessment reports, to identify potential DDI's involving anticancer drugs. For each potential DDI a concept report for risk analysis and practical advice for management was created. Subsequently, this risk analysis and the corresponding advice were assessed and weighed. A total of 290 potential DDIs have been identified in the literature thus far. Of these 290 potential DDIs, the Expert Group has identified 94 (32%) DDIs as clinically relevant, with a need for an automated alert and a suggested intervention. Furthermore, 110 DDIs have been identified as clinically not relevant. For 86 potential DDIs evidence supporting a relevant DDI was insufficient and in these cases neither an alert nor advice regarding a suggested intervention were formulated. A transparent risk analysis is presented for identification of clinically relevant DDIs with anticancer drugs. Integration of DDI guidelines into the national electronic prescribing system is essential to achieve optimal efficacy and minimal toxicity in patients receiving anticancer therapy. A clear overview of clinically relevant DDIs with anticancer therapy provides clinicians with a structured, evidence-based and consensus-built tool for anticancer therapy surveillance.
Keywords: Cancers; Chemotherapy; Drug-drug Interactions; Herbals; Practice.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest RvL: Research (unrestricted) grants Roche, Bayer, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astellas, BMS. Consultancy: MSD, BMS, Sanofi, Astellas, Pfizer, Roche Travel grants: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas NS: provided consultation or attended advisory boards for AIMM Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses Pharma. N Steeghs received research grants for the institute from AB Science, Abbvie, Actuate Therapeutics, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cantargia, Cytovation, Deciphera, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, InteRNA, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Taiho, Takeda (outside the submitted work) TvG: In the last 3 years TvG has received lecture fees and study grants from Chiesi and Astellas, in addition to consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics, Vitaeris, CSL Behring, Astellas, Aurinia Pharma and Novartis. In all cases money has been transferred to hospital accounts, and none has been paid to his personal bank accounts. TvG does not have employment or stock ownership at any of these companies, and neither does he have patents or patent applications MlC, AR, AvdT, BvV, WK, BW, OV, and FJ report no conflict of interest or funding information
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
