Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 3;40(20):2841-2847.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.069. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies

Affiliations

Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies

M A Sughayer et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Little is known about the efficacy and durability of anti-RBD IgG antibodies induced by certain SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. It has been shown that neutralizing antibodies are associated with the protection against re-infection. This study aims to compare the mean titers, duration, and efficacy of generating protective anti-RBD IgG antibody response among recipients of Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, and Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, we aimed to compare the susceptibility of getting COVID-19 breakthrough infections after various types of vaccines.

Materials and methods: Samples from 2065 blood bank donors and healthcare workers at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) were collected between February and September 2021. Anti-Spike/RBD IgG levels were measured using Chemiluminescent microparticle-immunoassay (CMIA) (ARCHITECT IgG II Quant test, Abbott, USA).

Results: The mean titer of anti-RBD IgG levels was significantly diverse among different types of vaccines. The highest titer level was seen in participants who took a third booster vaccine shot, followed by Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, and Sinopharm vaccine. The mean titer levels of anti-RBD IgG antibodies in the Pfizer vaccinated group was the highest after vaccination but started to drop after 60 days from vaccination unlike AstraZeneca and Sinopharm vaccine-induced antibodies where the mean titers continued to be stable until 120 days but their levels were significantly lower. Most of the breakthrough infections were among the Sinopharm vaccinated group and these breakthroughs happened at random times for the three main types of vaccines.

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that the mean-titer of anti-RBD IgG levels drop after four months which is the best time to take the additional booster shot from a more potent vaccine type such as mRNA vaccines that might be needed in Jordan and worldwide.

Keywords: Anti-RBD antibody; Antibody titer; Blood bank donors, vaccine; COVID-19; Healthcare workers; IgG; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparing the probability of being seropositive for anti-RBD IgG antibodies among the three main vaccine types.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Titer of anti-RBD IgG in all vaccinated participants vs post vaccinations period p-value < 0.005.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of the mean titer of anti-RBD IgG in vaccinated participants during the five-time intervals for the three main anti-COVID-19 vaccines.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The probability of a possible breakthrough infection with the SARS-Cov2 virus after vaccination regardless of the type of vaccine administered.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Box and Whisker plot for the 12 participants duration period between the second vaccine dose and COVID-19 breakthrough infection for the three main vaccine types.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu A., Peng Y., Huang B., Ding X., Wang X., Niu P., et al. Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27(3):325–328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chia W.N., Tan C.W., Foo R., Kang A.E.Z., Peng Y., Sivalingam V., et al. Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):1497–1505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellizzi S., Alsawalha L., Sheikh Ali S., Sharkas G., Muthu N., Ghazo M., et al. A three-phase population based sero-epidemiological study: Assessing the trend in prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 during COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan. One Health. 2021;13 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Tamimi M., Qaisieh R., Tadros R.E., Shalabi M., Alhasoun A., Kilani M.M. Successful flattening of COVID-19 epidemiological curve in Jordan. J Glob Health. 2020;10:020361. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Center B.D. Brookings Doha Center; Jordan. Doha, Qatar: 2021. Policy and institutional responses to COVID-19 in the Middle East and North Africa.

Publication types

Supplementary concepts