Working memory development in different modalities in children and young adults
- PMID: 35398516
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105422
Working memory development in different modalities in children and young adults
Abstract
Research on working memory (WM) development is concentrated largely on the verbal and visuospatial domains, whereas the tactile modality has received much less attention. The current study aimed to compare the development of storage and manipulation in the tactile sense with other modalities in children and young adults. A total of 96 typically developed individuals were divided into three equally numbered age groups in the ranges of 7 and 8, 11 and 12, and 20 to 29 years. They were asked to perform a battery of span tasks, including forward and backward stages, in the verbal, visual, visuospatial, and tactile modalities. Results showed improvement of WM performance across age in all modalities. In addition, in the forward stage, the Tactual Span was shorter than all other tasks and the Visuospatial Span was shorter than the Visual-Digit Span. In the backward stage, the Digit Span and Tactual Span had lower scores than the Visuospatial Span. Finally, interaction effects for the forward and backward stages were also significant, mainly indicating greater improvement in both storage and manipulation of the tactile sense compared with the other senses. It can be concluded that the tactile modality shows a course of WM development similar to the other modalities, in all of which the storage and manipulation components are affected differently. In addition, tactile WM improves more during growth than other modalities. Therefore, professionals in the field of education and neuropsychology are encouraged to use tactile tasks to assess and treat WM, particularly in response to the increased use of digital technology during recent years.
Keywords: Children; Modality; Span tasks; Tactual Span; Working memory.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Aging Processes of Working Memory in Different Modalities.Neurol Int. 2024 Sep 30;16(5):1122-1131. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16050084. Neurol Int. 2024. PMID: 39452686 Free PMC article.
-
Aging's Effect on Working Memory-Modality Comparison.Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):835. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040835. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 38672189 Free PMC article.
-
Introducing the Tactual Span: A New Task for Assessing Working Memory in the Teactile Modality.Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):1018-1031. doi: 10.1177/1073191120949929. Epub 2020 Aug 26. Assessment. 2021. PMID: 32844664
-
Differences in Verbal and Visuospatial Forward and Backward Order Recall: A Review of the Literature.Front Psychol. 2017 May 4;8:663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00663. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28522982 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Visuospatial working memory in specific language impairment: a meta-analysis.Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Sep;34(9):2586-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Jun 7. Res Dev Disabil. 2013. PMID: 23747944 Review.
Cited by
-
Aging Processes of Working Memory in Different Modalities.Neurol Int. 2024 Sep 30;16(5):1122-1131. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16050084. Neurol Int. 2024. PMID: 39452686 Free PMC article.
-
Non-Verbal Working Memory in Post-Stroke Motor Aphasia: A Pilot Study Using the Tactual Span.Neurol Int. 2025 Apr 17;17(4):58. doi: 10.3390/neurolint17040058. Neurol Int. 2025. PMID: 40278429 Free PMC article.
-
Aging's Effect on Working Memory-Modality Comparison.Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):835. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040835. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 38672189 Free PMC article.
-
Trajectories of working memory and decision making abilities along juvenile development in mice.Front Neurosci. 2025 Feb 28;19:1524931. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1524931. eCollection 2025. Front Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40092072 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources