Endplate abnormalities, Modic changes and their relationship to alignment parameters and surgical outcomes in the cervical spine
- PMID: 35398932
- DOI: 10.1002/jor.25333
Endplate abnormalities, Modic changes and their relationship to alignment parameters and surgical outcomes in the cervical spine
Abstract
Modic changes (MC) and endplate abnormalities (EA) have been shown to impact preoperative symptoms and outcomes following spinal surgery. However, little is known about how these phenotypes impact cervical alignment. This study aimed to evaluate the impact that these phenotypes have on preoperative, postoperative, and changes in cervical alignment in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of ACDF patients at a single institution. Preoperative magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) were used to assess for the MC and EA. Patients were subdivided into four groups: MC-only, EA-only, the combined Modic-Endplate-Complex (MEC), and patients without either phenotype. Pre and postoperative MRIs were used to assess alignment parameters. Associations with imaging phenotypes and alignment parameters were assessed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.5. A total of 512 patients were included, with 84 MC-only patients, 166 EA-only patients, and 71 patients with MEC. Preoperative MC (p = 0.031) and the MEC (p = 0.039) had significantly lower preoperative T1 slope compared to controls. Lower preoperative T1 slope was a risk factor for MC (p = 0.020) and MEC (p = 0.029) and presence of MC (Type II) and the MEC (Type III) was predictive of lower preoperative T1 slope. There were no differences in postoperative alignment measures or patient reported outcome measures. MC and endplate pathologies such as the MEC appear to be associated with worse cervical alignment at baseline relative to patients without these phenotypes. Poor alignment may be an adaptive response to these degenerative findings or may be a risk factor for their development.
Keywords: cervical; endplate; lordosis; modic change; sagittal alignment.
© 2022 Orthopaedic Research Society.
Similar articles
-
The Modic-endplate-complex phenotype in cervical spine patients: Association with symptoms and outcomes.J Orthop Res. 2022 Feb;40(2):449-459. doi: 10.1002/jor.25042. Epub 2021 Apr 6. J Orthop Res. 2022. PMID: 33749924
-
The Impact of Modic Changes on Preoperative Symptoms and Clinical Outcomes in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Patients.Neurospine. 2020 Mar;17(1):190-203. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040062.031. Epub 2020 Mar 31. Neurospine. 2020. PMID: 32252168 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical spine MRI phenotypes and prediction of pain, disability and adjacent segment degeneration/disease after ACDF.J Orthop Res. 2021 Mar;39(3):657-670. doi: 10.1002/jor.24658. Epub 2020 Mar 28. J Orthop Res. 2021. PMID: 32159238
-
Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 19850532
-
Relationship Between Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Patient Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Fusion Surgery Involving 3 or More Levels.World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e548-e554. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.088. Epub 2018 Feb 21. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29476994
Cited by
-
Modic Changes of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine and Their Effect on Neck and Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global Spine J. 2023 Jun;13(5):1405-1417. doi: 10.1177/21925682221143332. Epub 2022 Nov 30. Global Spine J. 2023. PMID: 36448648 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence, risk factors, natural history, and prognostic significance of Modic changes in the cervical spine: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 12,754 participants.Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Aug 29;47(1):504. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02570-2. Neurosurg Rev. 2024. PMID: 39207546
-
Evaluating the Impact of Modic Changes on Operative Treatment in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610158. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36011795 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical effect of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone in consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 22;24(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06453-3. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37217909 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211-1259.
-
- Fakhoury J, Dowling TJ. Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease. StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
-
- Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(8):1178-1184.
-
- Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40(3):607-624. Available from doi:10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009
-
- Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, et al. Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2013;38(22 Suppl 1):S149-S160.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical