Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;43(18):2885-2910.
doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1998717. eCollection 2021.

The impact of epistemic framing of teaching videos and summative assessments on students' learning of scientific methods

Sibel Erduran  1 , Olga Ioannidou  1 , Jo-Anne Baird  1
Affiliations

The impact of epistemic framing of teaching videos and summative assessments on students' learning of scientific methods

Sibel Erduran et al. Int J Sci Educ. .

Abstract

The incorporation of epistemic aspects of science in science education continues to be a challenge for researchers and practitioners. The paper presents an empirical study investigating how epistemic framing of scientific methods can be incorporated in science teaching, learning and summative assessment, and what impact such framing has on student learning outcomes. The study was conducted with 969 secondary students taught by 152 teachers from a national sample in England. Teaching videos and summative assessments were framed by Brandon's Matrix, a theoretical framework derived from the work of a philosopher of science and focusing on the diversity of scientific methods ranging from hypothesis testing to non-manipulative parameter measurement. The findings are discussed, including (a) the students' views on the teaching videos and summative assessments, (b) the impact of the teaching videos on students' understanding of the epistemic aspects of scientific methods and (c) students' performance on summative assessments in the context of science topics covered in high-stakes examinations in England. The findings suggest that the students' understanding of scientific methods significantly improved after watching the videos. Furthermore, the students' performance on the summative assessment items indicated a high level of accuracy in responses.

Keywords: Epistemic framing; scientific methods; summative assessment; teaching videos.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Sampling methods applied in the study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overview of data collection phases, target constructs and instruments.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Student assessment data from the osmosis scenario.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Student assessment data from the electromagnetism scenario.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. 10.1080/09500690050044044 - DOI
    1. Akgun, S., & Kaya, E. (2020). How do university students perceive the nature of science? Science & Education, 29, 299–330.
    1. Allchin, D. (2006). Lawson's shoehorn reprise. Science & Education, 15(1), 113–120. 10.1007/s11191-005-8922-9 - DOI
    1. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. 10.3102/0013189X07306523 - DOI
    1. Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39–85. 10.1080/07370008.2011.636495 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources