Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;11(3):432-439.
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-938.

The predictive utility of patient-reported outcomes and performance status for survival in metastatic lung cancer patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy

Affiliations

The predictive utility of patient-reported outcomes and performance status for survival in metastatic lung cancer patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy

Sarah Badaoui et al. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (chemoimmunotherapy) has become a first-line treatment option for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are self-reported measures that have shown promise in their predictive value for survival. However, there have been no studies that have assessed the prognostic performance of PROs in an advanced NSCLC cohort initiating first-line atezolizumab based chemoimmunotherapy.

Methods: This study used individual-participant data (IPD) from the IMpower130, IMpower131 and IMpower150 clinical trials. Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized to determine the association between pre-treatment PROs with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The prediction performance of PROs was assessed using the C-statistic. For the PRO measure identified as the most predictive of survival, an exploratory analysis comparing the predictive performance against Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was conducted.

Results: Patient-reported physical function, fatigue, appetite loss, pain, role function, global health status, social function, dyspnoea, constipation, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, emotional function, cognitive function, and financial difficulty were statistically associated with OS (P<0.05). Physical function (c=0.62), fatigue (c=0.61), and appetite loss (c=0.60) were the most predictive variables for OS. Patient-reported physical function (c=0.60) also had higher predictive performance than physician-defined ECOG-PS (c=0.57).

Conclusions: In patients with advanced NSCLC who received first line atezolizumab based therapy, pre-treatment PROs were prognostic for survival outcomes. Patient-reported physical function had higher predictive performance compared to physician-defined ECOG-PS. These results suggest PROs have significant worth in clinical practice and research trials of ICIs as a stratification factors.

Keywords: Patient-reported outcomes; immunotherapy; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); prognosis; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-21-938/coif). RAM is supported by the Cancer Council South Australia; a board member of not-for-profit entity Therapeutic Innovation Australia. MJS reports grants from Cancer Council of South Australia, during the conduct of the study; grants from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. AMH is supported by an Investigator Grant from Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS by patient-reported physical function for patients treated with atezolizumab. ACnP, atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel; ACP, atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel; ABCP, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel.

References

    1. Hanna NH, Schneider BJ, Temin S, et al. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO and OH (CCO) Joint Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:1608-32. 10.1200/JCO.19.03022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365-76. 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vodicka E, Kim K, Devine EB, et al. Inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in registered clinical trials: Evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov (2007-2013). Contemp Clin Trials 2015;43:1-9. 10.1016/j.cct.2015.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gupta D, Braun DP, Staren ED. Association between changes in quality of life scores and survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2012;21:614-22. 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01332.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ediebah DE, Coens C, Zikos E, et al. Does change in health-related quality of life score predict survival? Analysis of EORTC 08975 lung cancer trial. Br J Cancer 2014;110:2427-33. 10.1038/bjc.2014.208 - DOI - PMC - PubMed