Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 24:13:832678.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.832678. eCollection 2022.

Obesity Class Impacts Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Independent of Diabetes

Kirsten Neal  1   2 , Shahid Ullah  3 , Sarah J Glastras  2   4   5
Affiliations

Obesity Class Impacts Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Independent of Diabetes

Kirsten Neal et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity in pregnancy is a known risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Few studies have compared adverse pregnancy-related outcomes according to obesity severity. Hence, we aimed to examine the impact of obesity class on maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed data from all singleton births from mothers with obesity from 2013-2017 in Northern Sydney Local Health District in Sydney, Australia. Women were categorised into obesity class I (BMI 30-34.9kg/m2), class II (BMI 35-39.9 kg/m2) or class III (BMI 40+ kg/m2). Across BMI classes, we compared maternal outcomes including mode of delivery, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and preeclampsia, and neonatal outcomes including large- and small-for-gestational age (SGA, LGA), neonatal hypoglycaemia, birth defects and timing of birth. Logistic analyses were performed to explore the impact of maternal obesity class on these outcomes, adjusting for maternal age, country of birth, parity, diabetes (both pre-existing and gestational) and hypertension.

Results: There were 2466 births to women with obesity, class (69.1%), class II (21.8%), and class III (9.2%). 42.5% delivered by Caesarean section, 22.3% developed GDM and 11.2% had a hypertensive disorder in pregnancy, and Caesarean section and GDM were more common in women with higher class obesity. LGA occurred in 27.3% and SGA occurred in 4.0% of women across all classes of obesity. LGA rates were 49% more likely in women with class III compared to women with class I obesity (OR=1.49, CI 1.06-2.09, p=0.02). The presence of diabetes in the index pregnancy did not significantly impact risk of neonatal LGA between maternal obesity classes. Other neonatal adverse outcomes such as stillbirth and birth defects were more common in women with higher class obesity. SGA, neonatal hypoglycaemia, gestational age at delivery, APGAR 5-minute score and NICU admissions were similar across obesity classes, after adjustment for covariates.

Conclusions: Obesity class increases the risk of many adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obesity class is independently associated with LGA incidence in the neonate, independent of maternal factors including GDM. Ongoing efforts must be made to reduce obesity incidence in women of reproductive age to circumvent the adverse perinatal outcomes associated with obesity.

Keywords: Caesarean; gestational diabetes; large for gestational age (LGA); obesity; preeclampsia; small for gestation age (SGA); type 1 diabetes; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multivariate logistic regression model of three maternal outcomes by BMI group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multivariate logistic regression model of five neonatal outcomes by BMI group.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Catalano PM, Shankar K. Obesity and Pregnancy: Mechanisms of Short Term and Long Term Adverse Consequences for Mother and Child. BMJ (2017) 356:1–16. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torloni M, Betran A, Horta B, Nakamura M, Atallah A, Moron A, et al. . Prepregnancy BMI and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review of the Literature With Meta-Analysis. Obes Rev (2009) 10(2):194–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00541.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia’s Health 2016. Canberra: AIHW; (2016).
    1. O'Brien TE, Ray JG, Chan W-S. Maternal Body Mass Index and the Risk of Preeclampsia: A Systematic Overview. Epidemiology (2003) 14:368–74. doi: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000059921.71494.D1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander E, Begley C. Risks Associated With Obesity in Pregnancy, for the Mother and Baby: A Systematic Review of Reviews. Obes Rev (2015) 16(8):621–38. doi: 10.1111/obr.12288 - DOI - PubMed