Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;64(1):17-39.
doi: 10.1007/s00362-022-01307-x. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

Epidemic changepoint detection in the presence of nuisance changes

Affiliations

Epidemic changepoint detection in the presence of nuisance changes

Julius Juodakis et al. Stat Pap (Berl). 2023.

Abstract

Many time series problems feature epidemic changes-segments where a parameter deviates from a background baseline. Detection of such changepoints can be improved by accounting for the epidemic structure, but this is currently difficult if the background level is unknown. Furthermore, in practical data the background often undergoes nuisance changes, which interfere with standard estimation techniques and appear as false alarms. To solve these issues, we develop a new, efficient approach to simultaneously detect epidemic changes and estimate unknown, but fixed, background level, based on a penalised cost. Using it, we build a two-level detector that models and separates nuisance and signal changes. The analytic and computational properties of the proposed methods are established, including consistency and convergence. We demonstrate via simulations that our two-level detector provides accurate estimation of changepoints under a nuisance process, while other state-of-the-art detectors fail. In real-world genomic and demographic datasets, the proposed method identified and localised target events while separating out seasonal variations and experimental artefacts.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00362-022-01307-x.

Keywords: Changepoint detection; Piecewise stationary time series; Segmentation; Stochastic gradient methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consistency of the background level estimation. Time series simulated in three different scenarios were analysed by Algorithm 1 (shown in red). Lines are the inter-quartile range (solid) and 5–95% range (faint) of the background parameter estimates observed in 500 replications. For comparison, we show the ranges of background estimates obtained from two other segmentation algorithms and an oracle estimator (mean of true background points)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relative bias in the number of changepoints estimated by the proposed Algorithm 2 (pruned), and four alternative detectors. Data simulated in 1000 replications. For the proposed algorithm, bias is calculated separately in signal (solid line) and nuisance (dashed) segments
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ChIP-seq read counts and analysis results. Counts provided as mean coverage in 500 bp windows for a non-specific control sample (top) and H3K27ac histone modification (bottom), chromosome 1. Segments detected in the H3K27ac data by the method proposed here (Algorithm 2) and three other detectors are shown under the counts. Note that the proposed method can produce longer nuisance changes overlapped by signal segments. not does not specifically identify background segments; we show the ones with relatively low mean in light colour
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
UCI/McGill ChIP-seq data: read coverage in 1100 bp windows, black points, and manual annotations of peaks (boxes). Detection results using Algorithm 2 proposed in this paper, as well as three state-of-the-art methods are shown at the bottom
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Weekly deaths in Spain, in the 60–64 years age group, over 2017–2020 (black points). Detection results using the method proposed in this paper and three alternative methods shown as lines below

References

    1. Aminikhanghahi S, Cook DJ. A survey of methods for time series change point detection. Knowl Inf Syst. 2016;51(2):339–367. doi: 10.1007/s10115-016-0987-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baranowski R, Chen Y, Fryzlewicz P. Narrowest-over-threshold detection of multiple change points and change-point-like features. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 2019;81(3):649–672. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12322. - DOI
    1. Baud D, Qi X, Nielsen-Saines K, et al. Real estimates of mortality following COVID-19 infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(7):773. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30195-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bottou L. Online algorithms and stochastic approximations. In: Saad D, editor. Online learning and neural networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
    1. Fisch ATM, Eckley IA, Fearnhead P (2018) A linear time method for the detection of point and collective anomalies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01947v2