Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 24:13:785592.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.785592. eCollection 2022.

Potential Mechanisms for Why Not All Antipsychotics Are Able to Occupy Dopamine D3 Receptors in the Brain in vivo

Affiliations
Review

Potential Mechanisms for Why Not All Antipsychotics Are Able to Occupy Dopamine D3 Receptors in the Brain in vivo

Béla Kiss et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Dysfunctions of the dopaminergic system are believed to play a major role in the core symptoms of schizophrenia such as positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms. The first line of treatment of schizophrenia are antipsychotics, a class of medications that targets several neurotransmitter receptors in the brain, including dopaminergic, serotonergic, adrenergic and/or muscarinic receptors, depending on the given agent. Although the currently used antipsychotics display in vitro activity at several receptors, majority of them share the common property of having high/moderate in vitro affinity for dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs) and D3 receptors (D3Rs). In terms of mode of action, these antipsychotics are either antagonist or partial agonist at the above-mentioned receptors. Although D2Rs and D3Rs possess high degree of homology in their molecular structure, have common signaling pathways and similar in vitro pharmacology, they have different in vivo pharmacology and therefore behavioral roles. The aim of this review, with summarizing preclinical and clinical evidence is to demonstrate that while currently used antipsychotics display substantial in vitro affinity for both D3Rs and D2Rs, only very few can significantly occupy D3Rs in vivo. The relative importance of the level of endogenous extracellular dopamine in the brain and the degree of in vitro D3Rs receptor affinity and selectivity as determinant factors for in vivo D3Rs occupancy by antipsychotics, are also discussed.

Keywords: D2 receptor; D3 receptor; antipsychotics; brain occupancy; dopamine; schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BKi, BKr, and IL were employees of Gedeon Richter Plc.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Structure of hD3R: (A) hD3R-Gi complex; (B) binding of the selective agonist PD128907 in the orthosteric binding site (Secondary binding site and ECL2 are also depicted); (C) percent identity of human and rat D2R and D3R sequences; (D) comparison of hD2R (red) and hD3R (green); (E) comparison of active (green) and inactive (red) conformation of hD3R*.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Correlation between in vitro affinity of various dopaminergic antagonists for human recombinant D3Rs and D2Rs [data taken from Sokoloff et al. (80)]; ligand: [125I]sulpiride.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Correlation between in vitro affinity of antipsychotics for human D2Rs and D3Rs (A, data taken from Table 1; various radioligands) and for rat striatal D2Rs (striatal membrane) and cerebellar D3Rs (CB L9,10 membrane) (B); rat D2R and D3R affinity data derive from the extension of the study of Kiss et al. (81) and Kiss et al. (82). Determination of D2R and D3R affinity in membranes from CHO cells expressing human D3R or cerebellar L9,10 membranes (ligand: [3H]-(+)-PHNO) is described in Kiss et al. (81).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Dopamine, pramipexole and selected antipsychotics docked into experimental D3R structures*.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Graphical presentation of percent changes in striatal dopamine turnover indices (DATI) at D3R (i.e., cerebellar L9, 10) occupancy ED50 doses (A) and at D2R (i.e., striatal) occupancy ED50 doses (B) in vivo*,#. *Doses in brackets denote the occupancy ED50 doses (or close to ED50) taken from Table 2. Dopamine turnover index (DATI) was estimated from turnover dose-response curves (consisting of at least 4–5 doses, with five rats in each dose-group) for individual compounds listed in this figure. In cases where the occupancy ED50 values could not be exactly calculated (see Table 2) the turnover indices were determined at doses denoted with asterisks. Dopamine turnover index was defined as DA/(DOPAC+HVA). Determination of tissue dopamine, DOPAC and HVA was carried out exactly as described in Kiss et al. (22) (for abbreviations of drugs’ names, see Table 2). #Dopamine turnover data for cariprazine and DD-CAR were published in Kiss et al. (173). Turnover results of other compounds are unpublished and are on file at G. Richter. Plc.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perälä J, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI, Kuoppasalmi K, Isometsä E, Pirkola S, et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2007) 64:19–28. 10.1001/archpsyc.64.1.19 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Millan MJ, Agid Y, Brüne M, Bullmore ET, Carter CS, Clayton NS, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2012) 11:141–68. 10.1038/nrd3628 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howes OD, Murray RM. Schizophrenia: an integrated sociodevelopmental-cognitive model. Lancet. (2014) 383:1677–87. 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62036-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Millan MJ, Fone K, Steckler T, Horan WP. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia: clinical characteristics, pathophysiological substrates, experimental models and prospects for improved treatment. Eur J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2014) 24:645–92. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.03.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis KL, Kahn RS, Ko G, Davidson M. Dopamine in schizophrenia: a review and reconceptualization. Am J Psychiatry. (1991) 148:1474–86. 10.1176/ajp.148.11.1474 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources