Music Perception Abilities and Ambiguous Word Learning: Is There Cross-Domain Transfer in Nonmusicians?
- PMID: 35401340
- PMCID: PMC8984940
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.801263
Music Perception Abilities and Ambiguous Word Learning: Is There Cross-Domain Transfer in Nonmusicians?
Abstract
Perception of music and speech is based on similar auditory skills, and it is often suggested that those with enhanced music perception skills may perceive and learn novel words more easily. The current study tested whether music perception abilities are associated with novel word learning in an ambiguous learning scenario. Using a cross-situational word learning (CSWL) task, nonmusician adults were exposed to word-object pairings between eight novel words and visual referents. Novel words were either non-minimal pairs differing in all sounds or minimal pairs differing in their initial consonant or vowel. In order to be successful in this task, learners need to be able to correctly encode the phonological details of the novel words and have sufficient auditory working memory to remember the correct word-object pairings. Using the Mistuning Perception Test (MPT) and the Melodic Discrimination Test (MDT), we measured learners' pitch perception and auditory working memory. We predicted that those with higher MPT and MDT values would perform better in the CSWL task and in particular for novel words with high phonological overlap (i.e., minimal pairs). We found that higher musical perception skills led to higher accuracy for non-minimal pairs and minimal pairs differing in their initial consonant. Interestingly, this was not the case for vowel minimal pairs. We discuss the results in relation to theories of second language word learning such as the Second Language Perception model (L2LP).
Keywords: auditory perception; cross-situational word learning; music perception; phonological processing; pitch.
Copyright © 2022 Smit, Milne and Escudero.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Explaining L2 Lexical Learning in Multiple Scenarios: Cross-Situational Word Learning in L1 Mandarin L2 English Speakers.Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 25;12(12):1618. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121618. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36552078 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-Situational Learning of Minimal Word Pairs.Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar;40(2):455-65. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12243. Epub 2015 Apr 13. Cogn Sci. 2016. PMID: 25866868
-
Infants Encode Phonetic Detail during Cross-Situational Word Learning.Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 21;7:1419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01419. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27708605 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of musical expertise and musical training on pitch processing in music and language.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):399-410. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17943015 Review.
-
What have we learned from 15 years of research on cross-situational word learning? A focused review.Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1175272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175272. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37546430 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding preschoolers' word learning success in different scenarios: disambiguation meets statistical learning and eBook reading.Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1118142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118142. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37139006 Free PMC article.
-
Explaining L2 Lexical Learning in Multiple Scenarios: Cross-Situational Word Learning in L1 Mandarin L2 English Speakers.Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 25;12(12):1618. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121618. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36552078 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agresti A. (2010). Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources