Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 25:13:844427.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.844427. eCollection 2022.

Core Fucosylation Regulates the Function of Pre-BCR, BCR and IgG in Humoral Immunity

Affiliations
Review

Core Fucosylation Regulates the Function of Pre-BCR, BCR and IgG in Humoral Immunity

Yuhan Sun et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Most of the membrane molecules involved in immune response are glycosylated. N-glycans linked to asparagine (Asn) of immune molecules contribute to the protein conformation, surface expression, stability, and antigenicity. Core fucosylation catalyzed by core fucosyltransferase (FUT8) is the most common post-translational modification. Core fucosylation is essential for evoking a proper immune response, which this review aims to communicate. First, FUT8 deficiency suppressed the interaction between μHC and λ5 during pre-BCR assembly is given. Second, we described the effects of core fucosylation in B cell signal transduction via BCR. Third, we investigated the role of core fucosylation in the interaction between helper T (TH) cells and B cells. Finally, we showed the role of FUT8 on the biological function of IgG. In this review, we discussed recent insights into the sites where core fucosylation is critical for humoral immune responses.

Keywords: BCR; IgG; core fucosylation; humoral immune response; pre-B cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Glycosyltransferases involving in the biosynthesis of branching N-glycans. α2,6 sialyltransferases (ST6) and/or α2,3 sialyltransferases (ST3) that act on galactose, β1,4 galactosyltransferases (β1,4GalT) and/or β1,3 galactosyltransferases (β1,3GalT) that act on N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), and the family of N-acetylglucosamine transferases (GnT-I, GnT-II, GnT-III, GnT-IV, GnT-V and so on) that participate in GlcNAc synthesis. Fucosyltransferases (FUT3, FUT4, FUT5, FUT6, FUT7, FUT8, FUT9) can attach fucose in either α1,3/α1,4 or α1,6 linkage. These enzymes act sequentially, so that the product of one enzyme yields a preferred acceptor substrate for the subsequent action of another. Different proteins may have different subsets of N-glycans, which is referred to as microheterogeneity. All N-glycans share a common core sugar sequence, Manα1–6(Manα1–3) Manβ1–4GlcNAcβ1–4GlcNAcβ1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Core fucosylation modification in mammalian N-glycans is catalyzed by FUT8. The ER-Golgi pathway harbors many glycan-modifying enzymes in eukaryotic cells. The glycosyltransferases that operate in the ER are woven into the ER membrane. In contrast, the glycosyltransferases in Golgi compartments are generally type II membrane proteins with a small cytoplasmic amino-terminal domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a large lumenal domain that has an elongated stem region and a globular catalytic domain. FUT8 is a typical type II membrane protein and a Golgi apparatus–resident glycosyltransferase to catalyze the transfer of a fucose from GDP-fucose to the inner GlcNAc of N-glycans through α1,6-linkage (core fucosylation). There are two different pathways for producing GDP-fucose, namely salvage pathway and de novo pathway. The GDP-fucose is transferred from the cytosol into the Golgi apparatus by GDP-fucose transporter (GFT). The sugar additions, such as galactosylation by GalT, fucosylation by FUTs and sialylation by STs, mostly occurring in the trans-Golgi.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Core fucosylation regulates the assembly of pre-BCR. The early B cells growth depends on the assembly of pre-BCR. The conserved N46-glycosylation site on CH1 domain of μHC played a critical role in modulation of the interaction of μHC and λ5 before the formation of pre-BCR. Removal of core fucose of μHC impaired the interaction between μHC and λ5, and pre-BCR assembly, which is necessary and sufficient for signal transduction via pre-BCR and early B cell proliferation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Core fucosylation regulates the signal transduction via BCR. Upon Ag engagement, BCRs on the surface of B cells associated with lipid rafts and triggers signal transductions required for the activation of B cells. Core fucosylation promoted B cells to form a highly efficient lipid raft domain, thereby regulating signal transduction via BCR.
Figure 5
Figure 5
De-fucosylated IgG-Fc domain enhanced the induction of ADCC. ADCC is a specific effector mechanism of natural killer (NK) cells. ADCC refers to the killing of a target cell, which is coated with Abs by NK cells of the immune system. When the antibodies bind to the target Ag (tumor Ag), the IgG Fc is recognized by NK cells via FcγRs on their surfaces. Following recognition, the NK cells release chemicals, which then lyse and kill the target cell bound to the Ab. The removal of core fucosylation at Asn297 on IgG1 results in a 50~100-fold enhancement of ADCC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azagra A, Marina-Zárate E, Ramiro AR, Javierre BM, Parra M. From Loops to Looks: Transcription Factors and Chromatin Organization Shaping Terminal B Cell Differentiation. Trends Immunol (2020) 41:46–60. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2019.11.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hardy RR, Hayakawa K. B Cell Development Pathways. Annu Rev Immunol (2001) 19:595–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.595 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batista FD, Harwood NE. The Who, How and Where of Antigen Presentation to B Cells. Nat Rev Immunol (2009) 9:15–27. doi: 10.1038/nri2454 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baum LG, Cobb BA. The Direct and Indirect Effects of Glycans on Immune Function. Glycobiology (2017) 27:619–24. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwx036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolfert MA, Boons GJ. Adaptive Immune Activation: Glycosylation Does Matter. Nat Chem Biol (2013) 9:776–84. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1403 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources