Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;16(2):365-377.
doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09717-7. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

Categorizing objects from MEG signals using EEGNet

Affiliations

Categorizing objects from MEG signals using EEGNet

Ran Shi et al. Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals have demonstrated their practical application to reading human minds. Current neural decoding studies have made great progress to build subject-wise decoding models to extract and discriminate the temporal/spatial features in neural signals. In this paper, we used a compact convolutional neural network-EEGNet-to build a common decoder across subjects, which deciphered the categories of objects (faces, tools, animals, and scenes) from MEG data. This study investigated the influence of the spatiotemporal structure of MEG on EEGNet's classification performance. Furthermore, the EEGNet replaced its convolution layers with two sets of parallel convolution structures to extract the spatial and temporal features simultaneously. Our results showed that the organization of MEG data fed into the EEGNet has an effect on EEGNet classification accuracy, and the parallel convolution structures in EEGNet are beneficial to extracting and fusing spatial and temporal MEG features. The classification accuracy demonstrated that the EEGNet succeeds in building the common decoder model across subjects, and outperforms several state-of-the-art feature fusing methods.

Keywords: Deep learning; Feature fusion; Magnetoencephalography; Neural decoding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Durations of different ERP components (gray blocks represent the durations of P1, N1, P2a, and P2b) (Qin et al. 2016)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Layout of sensor chips provided in Elekta neuroimage TRUIX user’s manual. Each number in the figure corresponds to a group of sensors including 1 magnetometer and 2 gradiometers
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The proposed spatiotemporal feature fusion architecture
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Binary and four-class classification results at the individual level and across subject level
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Classification accuracies of different time intervals from 0 to 600 ms after stimulus onset

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander CA, Halgren E, Marinkovic K, Cash SS. Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal representations from MEG and EEG. Neuroimage. 2011;54(4):3028–3039. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.073. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almeida J, Mahon BZ, Caramazza A. The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychol Sci. 2010;21(6):772–778. doi: 10.1177/0956797610371343. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai L, Ma H, Huang Y, Luo Y. The development of native Chinese affective picture system–a pretest in 46 college students. Chin Ment Health J. 2005 doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2005.02.001. - DOI
    1. Blair K, Marcos PG, Hyung-Suk K, Norcia AM, Patrick S, Joseph N. A representational similarity analysis of the dynamics of object processing using single-trial EEG classification. PLoS ONE. 2015 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135697. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cetiner I, Var AA, Cetiner H. Classification of knot defect types using wavelets and KNN. Elektron Elektrotech. 2016;22(6):67–72. doi: 10.5755/j01.eie.22.6.17227. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources