Factors affecting the professional functioning of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 35403325
- PMCID: PMC9115205
- DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13629
Factors affecting the professional functioning of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Aim: To examine personal and organisational factors related to professional functioning of nurses and physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Background: Exposure to COVID-19-related stressors has been associated with lower self-reported professional functioning among health care workers.
Methods: A cross-sectional study among 115 hospital workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel was designed to explore (a) personal professional functioning, (b) clarity of guidelines, (c) work organisation by the management, and (d) health care workers' feeling of contribution to a global effort.
Results: A feeling of contribution to a global effort while treating patients with COVID-19 mediated the relationships between work organisation by the management and professional functioning (β = .05, p < .05). The clarity of guidelines for routine procedures (β = .21, p < .05) and a feeling of β contribution to a global effort (β = .34, p < .01) positively predicted professional functioning of nurses and physicians during COVID-19 pandemic (R2 = .19, p < .01).
Conclusions: In order to achieve optimal functioning of health care workers in an emergency, managers should provide clear guidelines and promote workers' feelings of contribution to a global effort.
Implications for nursing management: The provision of clear guidelines and protocols is essential for efficient emergency management. Expressing appreciation for health care workers and providing positive feedback may improve professional functioning.
Keywords: COVID-19; guideline clarity; health care workers; professional functioning; work management.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Nursing Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Managing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of health care workers' perceived organizational support and its consequences on their compassion, resilience and turnover intention.J Nurs Manag. 2022 Oct;30(7):2642-2652. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13824. Epub 2022 Oct 17. J Nurs Manag. 2022. PMID: 36181276 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with burnout among hospital-based healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional CRACoV-HHS study.J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jan;33(1):304-321. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16654. Epub 2023 Feb 15. J Clin Nurs. 2024. PMID: 36792068
-
To command is to serve: Senior leadership and policy-making predict hospital ward functioning in emergency.J Nurs Manag. 2019 May;27(4):697-705. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12734. Epub 2019 Jan 21. J Nurs Manag. 2019. PMID: 30430679
-
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD013582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013582. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32315451 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacy Emergency Preparedness and Response (PEPR): a proposed framework for expanding pharmacy professionals' roles and contributions to emergency preparedness and response during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jan;17(1):1967-1977. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 10. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021. PMID: 32389631 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical