Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct:55 Suppl 4:872-891.
doi: 10.1111/iej.13748. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

Present status and future directions - Managing perforations

Affiliations
Review

Present status and future directions - Managing perforations

Thomas Clauder. Int Endod J. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Root perforations are severe complications and are associated with compromised endodontic treatment outcomes, especially when bacterial infection is allowed to establish. Perforations may occur due to pathological processes or treatment consequences. Various dental materials have been proposed over the years for perforation repair with varying degrees of success. The use of bioactive materials, such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and other calcium-silicate cements, promotes a favourable environment for regeneration and has been used successfully for perforation repair. This is in contrast to materials used previously that often led to unpredictable outcomes. With the increasing range of new bioactive endodontic materials available, the number of potential materials being used for repair of root perforations is growing. Though promising to date, there is little evidence to support the use of most of these new materials. The aim of this narrative review is to provide the background, clinical techniques and outcome of nonsurgical and surgical perforation repair.

Keywords: MTA; perforation; perforation repair; resorption; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aguirre, R., ElDeeb, M.E. & ElDeeb, M.E. (1986) Evaluation of the repair of mechanical furcation perforations using amalgam, guttapercha, or indium foil. Journal of Endodontics, 12, 249-256.
    1. Al-Daafas, A. & Al-Nazhan, S. (2007) Histological evaluation of contaminated furcal perforation in dogs’ teeth repaired by MTA with or without internal matrix. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 103, 92-99.
    1. Alhadainy, H.A. (1994) Root perforations A review of literature. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 78, 368-374.
    1. Alhadainy, H.A. & Himel, V.T. (1994) An in vitro evaluation of plaster of Paris barriers used under amalgam and glass ionomer to repair furcation perforations. Journal of Endodontics, 20, 449-452.
    1. Allam, C.R. (1996) Treatment of stripping perforations. Journal of Endodontics, 22, 699-702.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources