Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Apr 11;24(4):e35554.
doi: 10.2196/35554.

Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Preventing Alcohol Consumption in Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sarah Soyeon Oh  1   2   3 , Jong Youn Moon #  4   5 , Doukyoung Chon  3 , Carol Mita  6 , Jourdyn A Lawrence  7 , Eun-Cheol Park  2   8 , Ichiro Kawachi #  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Preventing Alcohol Consumption in Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sarah Soyeon Oh et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Alcohol consumption in pregnancy has been associated with serious fetal health risks and maternal complications. While previous systematic reviews of digital interventions during pregnancy have targeted smoking cessation and flu vaccine uptake, few studies have sought to evaluate their effectiveness in preventing alcohol consumption during pregnancy.

Objective: This systematic review aims to assess (1) whether digital interventions are effective in preventing alcohol consumption during the pregnancy/pregnancy-planning period, and (2) the differential effectiveness of alternative digital intervention platforms (ie, computers, mobiles, and text messaging services).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for studies with digital interventions aiming to prevent alcohol consumption among pregnant women or women planning to become pregnant. A random effects primary meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the combined effect size and extent to which different digital platforms were successful in preventing alcohol consumption in pregnancy.

Results: Six studies were identified and included in the final review. The primary meta-analysis produced a sample-weighted odds ratio (OR) of 0.62 (95% CI 0.42-0.91; P=.02) in favor of digital interventions decreasing the risk of alcohol consumption during pregnancy when compared to controls. Computer/internet-based interventions (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.93) were an effective platform for preventing alcohol consumption. Too few studies of text messaging (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.29-2.52) were available to draw a conclusion.

Conclusions: Overall, our review highlights the potential for digital interventions to prevent alcohol consumption among pregnant women and women planning to become pregnant. Considering the advantages of digital interventions in promoting healthy behavioral changes, future research is necessary to understand how certain platforms may increase user engagement and intervention effectiveness to prevent women from consuming alcohol during their pregnancies.

Keywords: alcohol; alcohol consumption; computer-based intervention; digital health; digital intervention; fetal alcohol spectrum disorders; fetal alcohol syndrome; internet-based intervention; mHealth; meta-analysis; mobile health; mother; pregnancy; systematic review; text message; text messaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart of the literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effectiveness of digital interventions for preventing alcohol consumption in pregnancy [26,27,29-32].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effectiveness of digital interventions by platform [26,27,29-32].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effectiveness of digital interventions by quality risk of bias [26,27,29-32].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Risk of bias summary [26,27,29-32].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Funnel plot assessing publication bias.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bailey BA, Sokol RJ. Prenatal alcohol exposure and miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm delivery, and sudden infant death syndrome. Alcohol Res Health. 2011;34(1):86–91. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23580045 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popova S, Lange S, Probst C, Gmel G, Rehm J. Global prevalence of alcohol use and binge drinking during pregnancy, and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Biochem Cell Biol. 2018 Apr;96(2):237–240. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2017-0077. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seguin D, Gerlai R. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: Zebrafish in the analysis of the milder and more prevalent form of the disease. Behav Brain Res. 2018 Oct 15;352:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.005. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28988969 S0166-4328(17)31429-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sellman D, Connor J. In utero brain damage from alcohol: a preventable tragedy. N Z Med J. 2009 Nov 20;122(1306):6–8. - PubMed
    1. Lyall V, Wolfson L, Reid N, Poole N, Moritz KM, Egert S, Browne AJ, Askew DA. "The Problem Is that We Hear a Bit of Everything…": A Qualitative Systematic Review of Factors Associated with Alcohol Use, Reduction, and Abstinence in Pregnancy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 26;18(7):3445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073445. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=ijerph18073445 ijerph18073445 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types