Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;12(4):1359-1363.
doi: 10.3233/JPD-223190.

Including People with Parkinson's Disease in Clinical Study Design and Execution: A Call to Action

Affiliations

Including People with Parkinson's Disease in Clinical Study Design and Execution: A Call to Action

Marjan J Meinders et al. J Parkinsons Dis. 2022.

Abstract

The proactive inclusion of patients in the design and execution of clinical studies has been an emerging focus for decades. Such participatory research helps to design studies better, by addressing relevant research questions and defining outcomes that matter to patients. Yet, much remains to be learned about the best methods and exact impacts of patient engagement in research in general, and more specifically, about the specific challenges that come with Parkinson's disease. Here we present the lived experiences of patient researchers living with Parkinson's disease, as a motivation for the value of their perspectives in research and as a call to action for empirical research on how to successfully include patient researchers.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; Patient participation; patient advocacy; patient preference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

References

    1. Anderson M, McCleary KK (2015) From passengers to co-pilots: Patient roles expand. Sci Transl Med 7, 291fs225. - PubMed
    1. McCarron TL, Clement F, Rasiah J, Moran C, Moffat K, Gonzalez A, Wasylak T, Santana M (2021) Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review. Health Expect 24, 1378–1390. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levitan B, Getz K, Eisenstein EL, Goldberg M, Harker M, Hesterlee S, Patrick-Lake B, Roberts JN, DiMasi J (2018) Assessing the financial value of patient engagement: A quantitative approach from CTTI’s patient groups and clinical trials project. Ther Innov Regul Sci 52, 220–229. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laurance J, Henderson S, Howitt PJ, Matar M, Al Kuwari H, Edgman-Levitan S, Darzi A (2014) Patient engagement: Four case studies that highlight the potential for improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 33, 1627–1634. - PubMed
    1. Sacristán JA, Aguarón A, Avendaño-Solá C, Garrido P, Carrión J, Gutiérrez A, Kroes R, Flores A (2016) Patient involvement in clinical research: Why, when, and how. Patient Prefer Adherence 10, 631–640. - PMC - PubMed