Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):604-613.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0609.

Prediction of Long-term Survival After Status Epilepticus Using the ACD Score

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prediction of Long-term Survival After Status Epilepticus Using the ACD Score

Lars Egil Roberg et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Figure 2.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Neurol. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):634. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1401. JAMA Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35695888 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Early prediction of long-term mortality in status epilepticus is important given the high fatality rate in the years after diagnosis.

Objective: To improve prognostication of long-term mortality after status epilepticus diagnosis.

Design, settings, and participants: This retrospective, multicenter, multinational cohort study analyzed adult patients who were diagnosed with and treated for status epilepticus at university hospitals in Odense, Denmark, between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017, as well as in Oslo, Norway; Marburg, Germany; and Frankfurt, Germany. They were aged 18 years or older and had first-time, nonanoxic status epilepticus. A new scoring system, called the ACD score, for predicting 2-year (long-term) mortality after hospital discharge for status epilepticus was developed in the Danish cohort and validated in the German and Norwegian cohorts. The ACD score represents age at onset, level of consciousness at admission, and duration of status epilepticus. Data analysis was performed between September 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020.

Exposures: Long-term follow-up using data from national and local civil registries in Denmark, Norway, and Germany.

Main outcomes and measures: The predefined end point was 2-year survival for all patients and for a subgroup of patients with status epilepticus causes that were not damaging or were less damaging to the brain. Neurological deficits before and after onset, demographic characteristics, etiological categories of status epilepticus, comorbidities, survival, time points, treatments, and prognostic scores for different measures were assessed.

Results: A total of 261 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.2 [14.8] years; 132 women [50.6%]) were included, of whom 145 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [15.0] years; 78 women [53.8%]) had status epilepticus causes that were not damaging or were less damaging to the brain. The validation cohort comprised patients from Norway (n = 139) and Germany (n = 906). At hospital discharge, 29.8% of patients (n = 64 of 215) had new moderate to severe neurological deficits compared with baseline. New neurological deficits were a major predictor of 2-year survival after hospital discharge (odds ratio, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.2-11.8); this association was independent of etiological category. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in coma and duration of status epilepticus were associated with development of new neurological deficits, and a simple 3-factor score (ACD score) combining these 2 risk factors with age at onset was developed to estimate survival after status epilepticus diagnosis. The ACD score had a linear correlation with 2-year survival (Pearson r2 = 0.848), especially in the subset of patients with a low likelihood of brain damage.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that age, long duration, and nonconvulsive type of status epilepticus in coma were associated with the development of new neurological deficits, which were predictors of long-term mortality. Accounting for risk factors for new neurological deficits using the ACD score is a reliable method of prediction of long-term outcome in patients with status epilepticus causes that were not damaging or were less damaging to the brain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Strzelczyk reported receiving personal fees from Arvelle Therapeutics, Desitin Arzneimittel, Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals, Marinus Pharma, UNEEG Medical, UCB (Union Chimique Belge) Pharma, and Zogenix as well as grants from Zogenix and GW Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Dr Rosenow reported receiving personal fees as a speaker from Angelini Pharma Inc, Eisai GmbH, Arvelle Therapeutics, Novartis, UCB Pharma, and GW Pharmaceuticals; personal fees as an advisor from Arvelle Therapeutics and UCB Pharma; personal fees as a course organizer from Eisai GmbH; and research grants from Eisai GmbH, European Union, and LOEWE programme of the federal state of Hesse outside the submitted work. Dr Beniczky reported receiving personal fees as a speaker from Natus Neuro, personal fees as a consultant from Epihunter, and personal fees as a speaker from Eisai A/S outside the submitted work. Dr. Beier reported receiving personal fees as speaker from Angelini Pharma Inc, Eisai A/S, and UCB Nordic A/S; personal fees as an advisor from Arvelle Therapeutics; and research grants from Eisai A/S. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. New Neurological Deficits in Patients With Status Epilepticus
Kaplan-Meier survival curves in patients who were discharged alive with no or minor (<5 points’ difference in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score from before status epilepticus diagnosis to first follow-up), moderate (5-10 points’ difference), or severe (>10 points’ difference) neurological deficits (A); patients with remote symptomatic status epilepticus who were discharged alive with no or minor (<5 points’ increase in NIHSS score) or new (≥5 points’ increase) neurological deficits (B); overview of the ACD score and its components (C); and cumulative cohort of patients with nonanoxic status epilepticus from Germany and Norway (n = 1306) (D). Censored patients are indicated by tick marks. ACD indicates age at onset, level of consciousness at admission, and duration of status epilepticus.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Validation of the ACD Score and Nomogram for Predicting 2-Year Survival
A, Kaplan-Meier survival curves in patients with status epilepticus of varying causes who were treated in Germany (n = 477) and Norway (n = 105). B, Pearson correlation between 2-year survival and ACD score (n = 792; Pearson r2 = 0.848). C, Nomogram for estimating 2-year mortality in patients with status epilepticus causes that were not damaging or were less damaging. ACD indicates age at onset, level of consciousness at admission, and duration of status epilepticus.

Comment in

  • Surviving the Storm-Surviving Status Epilepticus.
    Widdess-Walsh P. Widdess-Walsh P. Epilepsy Curr. 2022 Sep 23;22(6):359-361. doi: 10.1177/15357597221122648. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec. Epilepsy Curr. 2022. PMID: 36426189 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Kantanen AM, Reinikainen M, Parviainen I, Kälviäinen R. Long-term outcome of refractory status epilepticus in adults: a retrospective population-based study. Epilepsy Res. 2017;133:13-21. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.03.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodin E, Krogstad MH, Aukland P, et al. . High long-term mortality after incident status epilepticus in adults: results from a population-based study. Epilepsia. 2019;60(1):33-41. doi:10.1111/epi.14602 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aukland P, Lando M, Vilholm O, Christiansen EB, Beier CP. Predictive value of the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and its components for long-term survival. BMC Neurol. 2016;16(1):213. doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0730-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Møller HS, Rodin E, Aukland P, Lando M, Christiansen EB, Beier CP. Epidemiology-based mortality score is associated with long-term mortality after status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2019;31(1):135-141. doi:10.1007/s12028-018-0663-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eriksson KJ, Koivikko MJ. Status epilepticus in children: aetiology, treatment, and outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(10):652-658. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07358.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types