Barriers and Motives for Complying With "Sexual Distancing" Among Men Who Have Sex With Men During the First COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Amsterdam: A Qualitative Study
- PMID: 35404868
- PMCID: PMC9196919
- DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001636
Barriers and Motives for Complying With "Sexual Distancing" Among Men Who Have Sex With Men During the First COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Amsterdam: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Background: Between March 15 and May 31, 2020, the Dutch government imposed lockdown and health measures to curb the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As part of social distancing, sexual distancing was one of these measures. Sexual distancing implied refraining from sex with partners outside of one's household. We aimed to elucidate barriers and motives for complying with sexual distancing and related factors that could have led to (non)compliance among men who have sex with men.
Methods: In this exploratory qualitative study, we interviewed men who have sex with men who visited the center for sexual health in Amsterdam during the first COVID-19 lockdown using a semistructured interview guide from March to May 2020. We interviewed both men who complied and did not comply with sexual distancing. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an open-coding process in MAXQDA.
Results: We included 18 noncompliers and 4 compliers to COVID-19 sexual distancing. Barriers to compliance were the following: lack of information on, or understanding of, the need for sexual distancing; being single; having had an active sex life before COVID-19; a high perceived importance of the social aspect of sex; a strong urge for sex; using sex to cope with the negative impact of the pandemic; being under the influence of alcohol or drugs; and not perceiving COVID-19 as a serious health threat. Motives for compliance were the following: perceiving COVID-19 as a serious health threat, direct confrontation with critically ill COVID-19 patients, protecting someone dear from COVID-19, and being convinced of the importance of social and/or sexual distancing measures.
Conclusions: Information on sexual distancing needs to be made more explicit, accessible, understandable, inclusive, customized to individual barriers, and relatable to the key populations. This may improve the effectiveness of measures and health recommendations in both the current COVID-19 pandemic and future respiratory outbreaks.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: None declared.
References
-
- ECDC . Considerations relating to social distancing measures in response to the COVID-19 epidemic. Stockhom, Sweden: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2020.
-
- Rijksoverheid, Coronavirus tijdlijn. Available at: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/coronavirus-tijdlijn. Accessed April 23, 2022.
-
- Bontjes A. RIVM past advies singels aan: knuffelmaatje of seksbuddy mag. 2020. NRC Handelsblad. Available at: https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2020/05/13/coronablog-14-mei-a3999696#upd20200.... Accessed April 23, 2022.
-
- RIVM . Regeling Aanvullende Seksuele Gezondheidszorg (ASG). Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. Available at: https://www.rivm.nl/regeling-aanvullende-seksuele-gezondheidszorg-asg. Accessed April 23, 2022.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
