Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct-Dec;37(4):E59-E66.
doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000627. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

Development of Nurse-Sensitive, Emergency Department-Specific Quality Indicators Using a Modified Delphi Technique

Affiliations

Development of Nurse-Sensitive, Emergency Department-Specific Quality Indicators Using a Modified Delphi Technique

Lisa Wolf et al. J Nurs Care Qual. 2022 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Background: There is no identified set of nursing-sensitive, emergency department (ED)-specific quality indicators.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to address the gap in quality indicators specific to the emergency care environment and identify a list of nursing-sensitive, ED-specific quality indicators across ED populations and phases of the ED visit for further development and testing.

Methods: A modified Delphi technique was used to reach initial consensus.

Results: Four thematic groups were identified, and quality indicators within each were rank ordered. Of the 4 groups, 21 quality indicators were identified: triage (6) was ranked highest, followed by special populations (4), transitions of care (4), and medical/surgical (7).

Conclusions: Many of the recommended metrics were questionable because they are nonspecific to the ED setting or subject to influences in the emergency care environment. Some identified priorities for quality indicator development were unsupported; we recommend that alternate methodologies be used to identify critical areas of quality measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Montalvo I. The National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators™ (NDNQI®). Online J Issues Nurs. 2007;12(3):112–214. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol12No03Man02
    1. Arslanian-Engoren C. Do emergency nurses' triage decisions predict differences in admission or discharge diagnoses for acute coronary syndromes? J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19(4):280–286. doi:10.1097/00005082-200407000-00008
    1. Gerdtz MF, Chu M, Collins M, et al. Factors influencing consistency of triage using the Australasian Triage Scale: implications for guideline development. Emerg Med Australas. 2009;21(4):277–285. doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2009.01197.x
    1. Holdgate A, Morris J, Fry M, Zecevic M. Accuracy of triage nurses in predicting patient disposition. Emerg Med Australas. 2007;19(4):341–345. doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00996.x
    1. Durand AC, Gentile S, Gerbeaux P, et al. Be careful with triage in emergency departments: interobserver agreement on 1,578 patients in France. BMC Emerg Med. 2011;11:11. doi:10.1186/1471-227X-11-19