Deployment of short-term assays for the detection of carcinogens; genetic and molecular considerations
- PMID: 3540645
- DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(86)90025-4
Deployment of short-term assays for the detection of carcinogens; genetic and molecular considerations
Abstract
The deployment of short-term assays for the detection of carcinogens inevitably has to be based on the genetic alterations actually involved in carcinogenesis. This paper gives an overview of oncogene activation and other mutagenic events connected with cancer induction. It is emphasized that there are indications of DNA alterations in carcinogenicity, which are not in accordance with "conventional" mutations and mutation frequencies, as measured by short-term assays of point mutations, chromosome aberrations and numerical chromosome changes. This discrepancy between DNA alterations in carcinogenicity and the endpoints of short-term assays in current use include transpositions, insertion mutations, polygene mutations, gene amplifications and DNA methylations. Furthermore, tumourigenicity may imply an induction of a genetic instability, followed by a cascade of genetic alterations. The evaluation of short-term assays for carcinogenesis mostly involves two correlations that is, between mutation and animal cancer data on the one hand and between animal cancer data and human carcinogenicity on the other. It should be stressed that animal bioassays for cancer in general imply tests specifically for the property of chemicals to function as complete carcinogens, which may be a rather poor reflection of the actual situation in human populations. The primary aim of short-term mutagenicity assays is to provide evidence as to whether a compound can be expected to cause mutations in humans, and such evidence has to be considered seriously even against a background of negative cancer data. For the evaluation of data from short-term assays the massive amount of empirical data from different assays should be used and new computer systems in that direction can be expected to provide improved predictions of carcinogenicity.
Similar articles
-
Short-term testing--are we looking at wrong endpoints?Mutat Res. 1988 May-Aug;205(1-4):13-24. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(88)90004-3. Mutat Res. 1988. PMID: 3285184 Review.
-
Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.IARC Sci Publ. 1999;(146):499-536. IARC Sci Publ. 1999. PMID: 10353401 Review.
-
The unique role of rodents in the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.Mutat Res. 1983 Jun;115(2):177-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(83)90003-9. Mutat Res. 1983. PMID: 6343849 Review.
-
Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond). 1991;42:1-80. Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond). 1991. PMID: 1763238
-
Implications for genetic toxicology of the chromosomal breakage syndromes.Mutat Res. 1991 Apr;247(2):221-9. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(91)90018-j. Mutat Res. 1991. PMID: 2011140 Review.
Cited by
-
Utility of short-term tests for genetic toxicity.Cell Biol Toxicol. 1989 Jun;5(2):189-200. doi: 10.1007/BF00122652. Cell Biol Toxicol. 1989. PMID: 2670087 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources