Breast Lesion Classification with Multiparametric Breast MRI Using Radiomics and Machine Learning: A Comparison with Radiologists' Performance
- PMID: 35406514
- PMCID: PMC8997089
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071743
Breast Lesion Classification with Multiparametric Breast MRI Using Radiomics and Machine Learning: A Comparison with Radiologists' Performance
Abstract
This multicenter retrospective study compared the performance of radiomics analysis coupled with machine learning (ML) with that of radiologists for the classification of breast tumors. A total of 93 consecutive women (mean age: 49 ± 12 years) with 104 histopathologically verified enhancing lesions (mean size: 22.8 ± 15.1 mm), classified as suspicious on multiparametric breast MRIs were included. Two experienced breast radiologists assessed all of the lesions, assigning a Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) suspicion category, providing a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) score based on lesion signal intensity, and determining the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Ten predictive models for breast lesion discrimination were generated using radiomic features extracted from the multiparametric MRI. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and the accuracy were compared using McNemar's test. Multiparametric radiomics with DWI score and BI-RADS (accuracy = 88.5%; AUC = 0.93) and multiparametric radiomics with ADC values and BI-RADS (accuracy= 88.5%; AUC = 0.96) models showed significant improvements in diagnostic accuracy compared to the multiparametric radiomics (DWI + DCE data) model (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively), but performed similarly compared to the multiparametric assessment by radiologists (accuracy = 85.6%; AUC = 0.03; p = 0.39). In conclusion, radiomics analysis coupled with the ML of multiparametric MRI could assist in breast lesion discrimination, especially for less experienced readers of breast MRIs.
Keywords: breast neoplasms; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Conflict of interest statement
Katja Pinker received payment for activities not related to the present article including lectures including service on speakers’ bureaus and for travel/accommodations/meeting expenses unrelated to activities listed from the European Society of Breast Imaging (MRI educational course, annual scientific meeting), IDKD educational course 2019, GBCC 10, TIBCS 2021, Olea Medical, Vara Merantix Healthcare GmbH, AURA Health Technologies GmbH and Siemens Healthineers. Maxine S. Jochelson has received honoraria not related to the present article including an honorarium from GE for speaking, and an honorarium for speaking at the Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Symposium and at MD Anderson. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
