Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 26;22(7):2552.
doi: 10.3390/s22072552.

The Validity of the Energy Expenditure Criteria Based on Open Source Code through two Inertial Sensors

Affiliations

The Validity of the Energy Expenditure Criteria Based on Open Source Code through two Inertial Sensors

Jaime Martín-Martín et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Through this study, we developed and validated a system for energy expenditure calculation, which only requires low-cost inertial sensors and open source R software. Five healthy subjects ran at ten different speeds while their kinematic variables were recorded on the thigh and wrist. Two ActiGraph wireless inertial sensors and a low-cost Bluetooth-based inertial sensor (Lis2DH12), assembled by SensorID, were used. Ten energy expenditure equations were automatically calculated in a developed open source R software (our own creation). A correlation analysis was used to compare the results of the energy expenditure equations. A high interclass correlation coefficient of estimated energy expenditure on the thigh and wrist was observed with an Actigraph and Sensor ID accelerometer; the corrected Freedson equation showed the highest values, and the Santos-Lozano vector magnitude equation and Sasaki equation demonstrated the lowest one. Energy expenditure was compared between the wrist and thigh and showed low correlation values. Despite the positive results obtained, it was necessary to design specific equations for the estimation of energy expenditure measured with inertial sensors on the thigh. The use of the same formula equation in two different placements did not report a positive interclass correlation coefficient.

Keywords: assessment; energy expenditure; equations; inertial sensors; open source R; run; validation; walk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Alfredo Salvatore is the executive director of SensorID and provided the inertial measurement unit equipped with a Lis2DH12 sensor provided by ST Microelectronics and derived by Sensor ID original firmware. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kinoshita K., Ozato N., Yamaguchi T., Sudo M., Yamashiro Y., Mori K., Ishida M., Katsuragi Y., Sasai H., Yasukawa T., et al. Association of sedentary behaviour and physical activity with cardiometabolic health in Japanese adults. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:2262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05302-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curran F., Blake C., Cunningham C., Perrotta C., van der Ploeg H., Matthews J., O’Donoghue G. Efficacy, characteristics, behavioural models and behaviour change strategies, of non-workplace interventions specifically targeting sedentary behaviour; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials in healthy ambulatory adults. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0256828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256828. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martín-Martín J., Roldán-Jiménez C., De-Torres I., Muro-Culebras A., Escriche-Escuder A., Gonzalez-Sanchez M., Ruiz-Muñoz M., Mayoral-Cleries F., Biró A., Tang W., et al. Behavior Change Techniques and the Effects Associated with Digital Behavior Change Interventions in Sedentary Behavior in the Clinical Population: A Systematic Review. Front. Digit. Health. 2021;3:620383. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.620383. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Creaser A.V., Clemes S.A., Costa S., Hall J., Ridgers N.D., Barber S.E., Bingham D.D. The Acceptability, Feasibility, and Effectiveness of Wearable Activity Trackers for Increasing Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:6211. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126211. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saeidifard F., Medina-Inojosa J.R., Supervia M., Olson T.P., Somers V.K., Erwin P.J., Lopez-Jimenez F. Differences of energy expenditure while sitting versus standing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2018;25:522–538. doi: 10.1177/2047487317752186. - DOI - PubMed