Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;22(7):2714.
doi: 10.3390/s22072714.

A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures

Ali Golabchi et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body's joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show that the deployment of industrial exoskeletons is still limited, and widespread adoption depends on different factors, including efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures. Given that exoskeletons are not yet adopted to their full potential, we propose a review based on these three evaluation dimensions that guides researchers and practitioners in properly evaluating and selecting exoskeletons and using them effectively in workplaces. Specifically, evaluating an exoskeleton needs to incorporate: (1) efficacy evaluation metrics based on both subjective (e.g., user perception) and objective (e.g., physiological measurements from sensors) measures, (2) target tasks (e.g., manual material handling and the use of tools), and (3) the body postures adopted (e.g., squatting and stooping). This framework is meant to guide the implementation and assessment of exoskeletons and provide recommendations addressing potential challenges in the adoption of industrial exoskeletons. The ultimate goal is to use the framework to enhance the acceptance and adoption of exoskeletons and to minimize future WMSDs in industrial workplaces.

Keywords: exoskeletons; exosuits; industrial exoskeletons; injury prevention; musculoskeletal disorders; systematic review; wearable robots; wearable technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of the systematic review (adopted from [9]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Framework for exoskeleton evaluation.

References

    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Data. [(accessed on 18 January 2022)];2021 Available online: https://www.bls.gov/iif/soii-data.htm#archive.
    1. Workers Health and Safety Center (WHSC) The Economics of Ergonomics. 2016. [(accessed on 18 January 2022)]. Available online: https://www.whsc.on.ca/Files/Resources/Ergonomic-Resources/RSI-Day-2016_....
    1. Bogue R. Exoskeletons—A Review of Industrial Applications. Ind. Robot Int. J. 2018;45:585–590. doi: 10.1108/IR-05-2018-0109. - DOI
    1. Hoffmann N., Prokop G., Weidner R. Methodologies for evaluating exoskeletons with industrial applications. Ergonomics. 2021;65:276–295. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1970823. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Standard Terminology for Exoskeletons and Exosuits. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2020.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources