Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy and the Mystery of Genetic Material: A Review Article
- PMID: 35408927
- PMCID: PMC8998436
- DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073568
Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy and the Mystery of Genetic Material: A Review Article
Abstract
This review focuses on recent findings in the preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of embryos. Different preimplantation genetic tests are presented along with different genetic materials and their analysis. Original material concerning preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was sourced by searching the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases in October and November 2021. The searches comprised keywords such as 'preimplantation', 'cfDNA'; 'miRNA', 'PGT-A', 'niPGT-A', 'aneuploidy', 'mosaicism', 'blastocyst biopsy', 'blastocentesis', 'blastocoel fluid', 'NGS', 'FISH', and 'aCGH'. Non-invasive PGT-A (niPGT-A) is a novel approach to the genetic analysis of embryos. The premise is that the genetic material in the spent embryo culture media (SECM) corresponds to the genetic material in the embryo cells. The limitations of niPGT-A are a lower quantity and lesser quality of the cell-free genetic material, and its unknown origin. The concordance rate varies when compared to invasive PGT-A. Some authors have also hypothesized that mosaicism and aneuploid cells are preferentially excluded from the embryo during early development. Cell-free genetic material is readily available in the spent embryo culture media, which provides an easier, more economic, and safer extraction of genetic material for analysis. The sampling of the SECM and DNA extraction and amplification must be optimized. The origin of the cell-free media, the percentage of apoptotic events, and the levels of DNA contamination are currently unknown; these topics need to be further investigated.
Keywords: aneuploidy; blastocoel; cell free DNA; embryo biopsy; preimplantation genetic testing; spent embryo culture media; trophectoderm biopsy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Zegers-Hochschild F., Adamson G.D., de Mouzon J., Ishihara O., Mansour R., Nygren K., Sullivan E., Vanderpoel S., International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology World Health Organization International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary of ART Terminology, 2009. Fertil. Steril. 2009;92:1520–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pinter B., Oliveira da Silva M., Bloemenkamp K., Fronteira I., Karro H. Assisted Reproductive Technologies in European Union: Findings of the Reproductive Health Report. [(accessed on 19 January 2022)]. Available online: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/chafea_pdb/assets/files/pdb/2007110/2007110....
-
- McLernon D.J., Harrild K., Bergh C., Davies M.J., de Neubourg D., Dumoulin J.C.M., Gerris J., Kremer J.A.M., Martikainen H., Mol B.W., et al. Clinical Effectiveness of Elective Single versus Double Embryo Transfer: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data from Randomised Trials. BMJ. 2010;341:c6945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6945. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Battaglia R., Palini S., Vento M.E., La Ferlita A., Lo Faro M.J., Caroppo E., Borzì P., Falzone L., Barbagallo D., Ragusa M., et al. Identification of Extracellular Vesicles and Characterization of MiRNA Expression Profiles in Human Blastocoel Fluid. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:84. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36452-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
