Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 11;22(1):358.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07340-3.

Gender differences in measles incidence rates in a multi-year, pooled analysis, based on national data from seven high income countries

Affiliations

Gender differences in measles incidence rates in a multi-year, pooled analysis, based on national data from seven high income countries

Manfred S Green et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Gender differences in a number of infectious diseases have been reported. The evidence for gender differences in clinical measles incidence rates has been variable and poorly documented over age groups, countries and time periods.

Methods: We obtained data on cases of measles by sex and age group over a period of 11-27 years from seven countries. Male to female incidence rate ratios (IRR) were computed for each year, by country and age group. For each age group, we used meta-analytic methods to combine the IRRs. Meta-regression was conducted to the estimate the effects of age, country, and time period on the IRR.

Results: In the age groups < 1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-44, and 45-64 the pooled IRRs (with 95% CI) were 1.07 (1.02-1.11), 1.10 (1.07-1.14), 1.03 (1.00-1.05), 1.05 (0.99-1.11), 1.08 (0.95-1.23), and 0.82 (0.74-0.92) respectively. The excess incidence rates (IR) from measles in males up to age 45 are remarkably consistent across countries and time-periods. In the age group 45-64, there is an excess incidence in women.

Conclusions: The consistency of the excess incidence rates in young males suggest that the sex differences are more likely due to physiological and biological differences and not behavioral factors. At older ages, differential exposure can play a part. These findings can provide further keys to the understanding of mechanisms of infection and tailoring vaccination schedules.

Keywords: Incidence rate ratios; Measles; Meta-analysis; Sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forest plot of the male to female measles IRRs for different years in Canada, England, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Spain in infants (< 1 years)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of the male to female measles IRRs for different years in Canada, England, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Spain for age 1–4 years
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of the male to female measles IRRs for different years in Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Spain for age 5–9 years
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of the male to female measles IRRs for different years in Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Spain for age 10–14 years
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of the male to female measles IRRs for different years in Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Spain for age 15–44 (or 15–39) years
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of the male to female measles IRRs for different years in Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Spain for age 45–64 (or 40–59) years

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Plans-Rubió P. Are the objectives proposed by the WHO for routine measles vaccination coverage and population measles immunity sufficient to achieve measles elimination from Europe? Vaccines (Basel) 2020;8:218. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020218. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ilyas M, Afzal S, Ahmad J, et al. The resurgence of measles infection and its associated complications in early childhood at a tertiary care hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. Pol J Microbiol. 2020;69:1–8. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2020-020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentley J, Rouse J, Pinfield J. Measles: pathology, management and public health issues. Nurs Stand. 2014;28:51–58. doi: 10.7748/ns.28.38.51.e8765. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Griffin DE. The immune response in measles: virus control, clearance and protective immunity. Viruses. 2016;8:282. doi: 10.3390/v8100282. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gendrel D, Chemillier-Truong M, Rodrique D, et al. Underestimation of the incidence of measles in a population of French children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992;11:1156–1157. doi: 10.1007/BF01961134. - DOI - PubMed