Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;29(5):1152-1173.
doi: 10.1177/09697330211022411. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

The justification for strike action in healthcare: A systematic critical interpretive synthesis

Ryan Essex, Sharon Marie Weldon  1
Affiliations

The justification for strike action in healthcare: A systematic critical interpretive synthesis

Ryan Essex et al. Nurs Ethics. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Strike action in healthcare has been a common global phenomenon. As such action is designed to be disruptive, it creates substantial ethical tension, the most cited of which relates to patient harm, that is, a strike may not only disrupt an employer, but it could also have serious implications for the delivery of care. This article systematically reviewed the literature on strike action in healthcare with the aim of providing an overview of the major justifications for strike action, identifying relative strengths and shortcomings of this literature and providing direction for future discussions, and theoretical and empirical research. Three major themes emerged related to (1) the relationship between healthcare workers, patients and society; (2) the consequences of strike action; and (3) the conduct of strike action. Those who argue against strike action generally cite the harms of such action, particularly as it relates to patients. Many also argue that healthcare workers, because of their skills and position in society, have a special obligation to their patients and society more generally. Those who see this action as not only permissible but also, in some cases, necessary have advanced several points in response, arguing that healthcare workers do not necessarily have any special obligation to their patients or society, and even if so, this obligation is not absolute. Overwhelmingly, when talking about the potential risks of strike action, authors have focused on patient welfare and the impact that a strike could have. Several directions for future work are identified, including greater explorations into how structural and systemic issues impact strike action, the need for greater consideration about the contextual factors that influence the risks and characteristics of strike action and finally the need to tie this literature to existing empirical evidence.

Keywords: Healthcare; nurse; protest; strike; strike action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Modified PRISMA flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hyman R. Strikes. London: Springer, 1989.
    1. Kaguthi GK, Nduba V, Adam MB. The impact of the nurses’, doctors’ and clinical officer strikes on mortality in four health facilities in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20: 469. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chatterjee P. India’s doctors protest over caste quota plans. Lancet 2006; 367: 1892–1892. - PubMed
    1. Riaz M, Bhaumik S. Police target doctors over strike action in Pakistan. Lancet 2012; 380: 97–97. - PubMed
    1. Adam MB, Muma S, Modi JA, et al. Paediatric and obstetric outcomes at a faith-based hospital during the 100-day public sector physician strike in Kenya. BMJ Glob Health 2018; 3(2): e000665. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types