Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jul;134(13-14):522-528.
doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02022-1. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment in clinical practice : User experience in times of a pandemic

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment in clinical practice : User experience in times of a pandemic

Mathias Maleczek et al. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The novel strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is highly contagious; therefore, special emphasis must be given to personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. Reusable elastomeric respirators were previously used in intensive care units (ICU). These respirators include full or half masks and devices modified to accommodate a filter. Although the general comfort of masks used in the ICU has been studied, data comparing multiple types of masks during a pandemic are missing.

Methods: A prospective randomized trial was conducted in an ICU. After standardized training, participants were randomized to use one of three mask types (full, half or snorkelling mask), each fitted with a filter equivalent to a class 3 particle-filtering half mask (FFP3) during one shift. The main outcomes were characteristics of using the mask itself (donning/doffing, quality of seal, cleaning), working conditions with the mask (vision, comfort, perceived safety, communication) and a subjective comparison to single-use FFP2/3 masks.

Results: A total of 30 participants were included in the trial, randomized to 10 participants per group. The masks were worn 6.4 (4.5) times (mean SD) for a total duration of 132 (66) min per shift. The tested masks were rated 7 (2.6) (mean SD) in comparison to FFP2/3 on a Likert scale (0: worst, 10: best). Significant differences between the masks were found in respect to comfort (7/4/8), donning (8/7/9), overall rating (8/5/8) and comparison to single-use FFP2/3 masks (9/7/9; full-, half, snorkelling mask).

Conclusion: Using reusable elastomeric masks is feasible in clinical practice. Full face masks were significantly better in terms of comfort, donning, overall rating and in comparison to single-use FFP2/3 masks.

Keywords: COVID; FFP3; Intensive care; Mask; SARS-CoV‑2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M. Maleczek, F. Toemboel, M. Van Erp, F. Thalhammer and B. Rössler declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Boxplots of all reported variables regarding mask performance are shown. Value is the value on the Likert scale, asterisk indicates reaching a significance level < 0.05. Comp. FFP comparison with FFP, Comm., Team communication with team, Comm., Pat. communication with patients

References

    1. Ortega R, Gonzalez M, Nozari A, Canelli R. Personal protective equipment and Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(26):e105. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm2014809. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ha JF. The COVID-19 pandemic, personal protective equipment and respirator: a narrative review. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74:e13578. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13578. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iversen K, Kristensen JH, Hasselbalch RB, et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and reduced risk of reinfection through six months: a Danish observational cohort study of 44,000 healthcare workers. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Regli A, Sommerfield A, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. The role of fit testing N95/FFP2/FFP3 masks: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2021;76:91–100. doi: 10.1111/anae.15261. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthcare workers. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommen.... Accessed 29 Sept 2021.

Publication types