Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 26;119(17):e2117779119.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117779119. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

The language of less-lethal weapons

Erika A Kaske  1 , Joel T Wu  2 , Rachel R Hardeman  3 , David P Darrow  4 , David J Satin  5
Affiliations

The language of less-lethal weapons

Erika A Kaske et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

It has been over 1 year since we observed the policing of the George Floyd protests in the United States [R. R. Hardeman, E. M. Medina, R. W. Boyd, N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 197-199 (2020)]. Multiple injury reports emerged in medical journals, and the scientific community called for law enforcement to discontinue the use of less-lethal weapons [E. A. Kaske et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 774-775 (2021) and K. A. Olson et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1081-1083 (2020)]. Despite progress in research, policy change has not followed a similar pace. Although the reasoning for this discrepancy is multifactorial, failure to use appropriate language may be one contributing factor to the challenges faced in updating policies and practices. Here, we detail how language has the potential to influence thinking and decision-making, we discuss how the language of less-lethal weapons minimizes harm, and we provide a framework for naming conventions that acknowledges harm.

Keywords: health inequities; less lethal; linguistics; nonlethal; protest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

    1. Lakoff G., Johnson M., Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, 2008).
    1. Evans V., “How we conceptualise time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition” in The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, Evans V., Bergen B. K., Zinken J., Eds. (Equinox Publishing, 2007), pp. 733–764.
    1. Bylund E., Athanasopoulos P., The Whorfian time warp: Representing duration through the language hourglass. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 146, 911–916 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Loftus E. F., Palmer J. C., Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 13, 585–589 (1974).
    1. Thibodeau P. H., Boroditsky L., Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS One 6, e16782 (2011). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources