Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 12;22(1):141.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02643-z.

Ipsilesional arm training in severe stroke to improve functional independence (IPSI): phase II protocol

Affiliations

Ipsilesional arm training in severe stroke to improve functional independence (IPSI): phase II protocol

Candice Maenza et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: We previously characterized hemisphere-specific motor control deficits in the ipsilesional, less-impaired arm of unilaterally lesioned stroke survivors. Our preliminary data indicate these deficits are substantial and functionally limiting in patients with severe paresis.

Methods: We have designed an intervention ("IPSI") to remediate the hemisphere-specific deficits in the ipsilesional arm, using a virtual-reality platform, followed by manipulation training with a variety of real objects, designed to facilitate generalization and transfer to functional behaviors encountered in the natural environment. This is a 2-site (primary site - Penn State College of Medicine, secondary site - University of Southern California), two-group randomized intervention with an experimental group, which receives unilateral training of the ipsilesional arm throughout 3 one-hour sessions per week for 5 weeks, through our Virtual Reality and Manipulation Training (VRMT) protocol. Our control group receives a conventional intervention on the contralesional arm, 3 one-hour sessions per week for 5 weeks, guided by recently released practice guidelines for upper limb rehabilitation in adult stroke. The study aims to include a total of 120 stroke survivors (60 per group) whose stroke was in the territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) resulting in severe upper-extremity motor impairments. Outcome measures (Primary: Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Abilhand, Barthel Index) are assessed at five evaluation points: Baseline 1, Baseline 2, immediate post-intervention (primary endpoint), and 3-weeks (short-term retention) and 6-months post-intervention (long-term retention). We hypothesize that both groups will improve performance of the targeted arm, but that the ipsilesional arm remediation group will show greater improvements in functional independence.

Discussion: The results of this study are expected to inform upper limb evaluation and treatment to consider ipsilesional arm function, as part of a comprehensive physical rehabilitation strategy that includes evaluation and remediation of both arms.

Trial registration: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration ID: NCT03634397 ; date of registration: 08/16/2018).

Keywords: Arm training; Ipsilateral deficits; Ipsilesional deficits; Less-impaired arm; Stroke motor deficits; Stroke rehabilitation; Stroke remediation; Virtual reality training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CM, RS, RV, BD, MD, LB, SJ, and DW declare that they have no competing interests. CW serves as a consultant for Enspire DBS Therapy, Inc. and MicroTransponder, Inc; receives royalty payments from Human Kinetics, Inc. (for 6th edition of Motor Control and Learning), and DemosMedical Publishers (for 2nd edition of Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram from first referral to final follow-up evaluation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Timeline of study events for each participant
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kinematic-virtual reality set-up
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ipsilesional arm therapy session activities for the experimental group
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Contralesional arm therapy sessions for participants randomized to the control group

References

    1. Morris JH, van Wijck F, Joice S, Ogston SA, Cole I, MacWalter RS. A Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Upper-Limb Task Training in Early Poststroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1237–1245. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stinear C. Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:1228–1232. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mani S, Mutha PK, Przybyla A, Haaland KY, Good DC, Sainburg RL. Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 4):1288–1303. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws283. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JPA. Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: Neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183:215–223. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1029-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maenza C, Good DC, Winstein CJ, Wagstaff DA, Sainburg RL. Functional Deficits in the Less-Impaired Arm of Stroke Survivors Depend on Hemisphere of Damage and Extent of Paretic Arm Impairment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020;34:39–50. doi: 10.1177/1545968319875951. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data