Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 23:3:100047.
doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2021.100047. eCollection 2021 Dec 30.

Enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation: The most favorable biotechnological methods for the release of bioactive peptides

Affiliations

Enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation: The most favorable biotechnological methods for the release of bioactive peptides

Dora Elisa Cruz-Casas et al. Food Chem (Oxf). .

Abstract

Bioactive peptides are biomolecules derived from proteins. They contain anywhere from 2 to 20 amino acids and have different bioactivities. For example, they have antihypertensive activity, antioxidant activity, antimicrobial activity, etc. However, bioactive peptides are encrypted and inactive in the parental protein, so it is necessary to release them to show their bioactivity. For this, there are different methods, where biotechnological methods are highly favorable, highlighting enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation. The choice of the method to be used depends on different factors, which is why it is essential to know about the process, its principle, and its advantages and disadvantages. The process of peptide release is critical to generate various peptide sequences, which will produce different biological effects in the hydrolysate. This review focuses on providing extensive information on the enzymatic method and microbial fermentation to facilitate selecting the method that provides the most benefits.

Keywords: Bioactive peptides; Biotechnology; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Microbial fermentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the different methods used for the release of encrypted bioactive peptides.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Graphic representation of the enzymatic hydrolysis process in the release of bioactive peptides.

References

    1. Acquah C., Chan Y.W., Pan S., Agyei D., Udenigwe C.C. Structure-informed separation of bioactive peptides. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2019;43(1):1–10. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.12765. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acquah, C., Stefano, E. Di, & Udenigwe, C. C. (2018). Role of hydrophobicity in food peptide functionality and bioactivity. Journal of Food Bioactives, 4, 88–98. 10.31665/jfb.2018.4164.
    1. Agyei D., Danquah M.K. Industrial-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical-grade bioactive peptides. Biotechnology Advances. 2011;29(3):272–277. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agyei, D., Ongkudon, C. M., Yi, C., Chan, A. S., & Danquah, M. K. (2016). Food and Bioproducts Processing Bioprocess challenges to the isolation and purification of bioactive peptides. 8, 244–246.
    1. Aluko R.E. Antihypertensive peptides from food proteins. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. 2015;6(1):235–262. doi: 10.1146/food.2015.6.issue-110.1146/annurev-food-022814-015520. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources