Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;13(5):829-846.
doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01254-8. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose as an Integral Part in the Management of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Affiliations

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose as an Integral Part in the Management of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Stefan Pleus et al. Diabetes Ther. 2022 May.

Abstract

For decades, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been considered a cornerstone of adequate diabetes management. Structured SMBG can follow different monitoring patterns, and it results in improved glycemic control, reduced hypoglycemia, and a better quality of life of people with diabetes. The technology, usability, and accuracy of SMBG systems have advanced markedly since their introduction a few decades ago. Current SMBG systems are small and easy to use, require small (capillary) blood sample volumes, and provide measurement results within seconds. In addition, devices are increasingly equipped with features such as connectivity to other devices and/or digital diaries and diabetes management tools. Although measurement quality can come close to or equal that of the glucose monitoring systems used by healthcare professionals, several available SMBG systems still do not meet internationally accepted accuracy standards, such as the International Organization for Standardization 15197 standard. Reports from China, India, and Brazil based on local experience suggest that in addition of the accuracy issues of SMBG systems, other obstacles also need to be overcome to optimize SMBG usage. Nonetheless, adequate usage of SMBG data is of high relevance for the management of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Keywords: Accuracy; Blood glucose monitoring systems; Diabetes management; Self-monitoring of blood glucose; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Example of a structured glucose testing profile (7-point profile) using a system for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). SMBG results were entered manually into the ACCU-CHEK® 360° View Paper tool (Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), showing postprandial hyperglycemia. The forms for mmol/L and mg/dL can be downloaded from the Electronic Supplementary Material of this article. b Example of a glucose pattern analysis using an SMBG system. The figure shows the same glucose testing profile as in a, but data of the SMBG system were transferred to the RocheDiabetes Care Platform and visualized. RocheDiabetes, ACCU-CHEK and ACCU-CHEK 360° are trademarks of Roche
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Difference plot showing methods comparisons for two systems for SMBG with higher (green squares) and lower (red triangles) levels of accuracy. The orange lines reflect the accuracy requirements of the current ISO 15197:2015 standard [21], i.e., 95% of measurements need to fall within up to ± 0.8 mmol/L (± 15 mg/dL) or ± 15% from the comparison method (for values < 5.6 mmol/L [< 100 mg/dL] or ≥ 5.6 mmol/L [≥ 100 mg/dL]). b Scatter plot of SMBG systems with higher (green squares) and lower (red triangles) levels of accuracy

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas 10th edition 2021. 2021. https://diabetesatlas.org/data/en/. Accessed 09 Dec 2021. - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Nathan DM, Genuth S, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–986. doi: 10.1056/nejm199309303291401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl_1). 10.2337/dc21-SINT.
    1. Mannucci E, Antenore A, Giorgino F, Scavini M. Effects of structured versus unstructured self-monitoring of blood glucose on glucose control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12:183–189. doi: 10.1177/1932296817719290. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schnell O, Alawi H, Battelino T, Ceriello A, Diem P, Felton AM, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: recent studies. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7:478–488. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700225. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources