Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):274.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03294-x.

Feasibility of virtual reality based training for optimising COVID-19 case handling in Uganda

Affiliations

Feasibility of virtual reality based training for optimising COVID-19 case handling in Uganda

Paul Buyego et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Epidemics and pandemics are causing high morbidity and mortality on a still-evolving scale exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. Infection prevention and control (IPC) training for frontline health workers is thus essential. However, classroom or hospital ward-based training portends an infection risk due to the in-person interaction of participants. We explored the use of Virtual Reality (VR) simulations for frontline health worker training since it trains participants without exposing them to infections that would arise from in-person training. It does away with the requirement for expensive personal protective equipment (PPE) that has been in acute shortage and improves learning, retention, and recall. This represents the first attempt in deploying VR-based pedagogy in a Ugandan medical education context.

Methods: We used animated VR-based simulations of bedside and ward-based training scenarios for frontline health workers. The training covered the donning and doffing of PPE, case management of COVID-19 infected individuals, and hand hygiene. It used VR headsets to actualize an immersive experience, via a hybrid of fully-interactive VR and 360° videos. The level of knowledge acquisition between individuals trained using this method was compared to similar cohorts previously trained in a classroom setting. That evaluation was supplemented by a qualitative assessment based on feedback from participants about their experience.

Results: The effort resulted in a COVID-19 IPC curriculum adapted into VR, corresponding VR content, and a pioneer cohort of VR trained frontline health workers. The formalized comparison with classroom-trained cohorts showed relatively better outcomes by way of skills acquired, speed of learning, and rates of information retention (P-value = 4.0e-09). In the qualitative assessment, 90% of the participants rated the method as very good, 58.1% strongly agreed that the activities met the course objectives, and 97.7% strongly indicated willingness to refer the course to colleagues.

Conclusion: VR-based COVID-19 IPC training is feasible, effective and achieves enhanced learning while protecting participants from infections within a pandemic setting in Uganda. It is a delivery medium transferable to the contexts of other highly infectious diseases.

Keywords: COVID-19; Medical education; Pandemics; Personal protective equipment; Virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Phase one and two of the pilot training
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Gender and vocational attributes of participants
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Score comparisons. a Distribution of scores for 52 individuals after undergoing VR training. b A comparison of the bottom baseline of an untrained cohort (blue bars) with a comparable VR-trained cohort
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Heatmap depicting extent of approval for the VR training as assessed from survey of participants based on eight criteria (X-axis). Considerably higher numbers of participants (brown) strongly approved of the training relative to those who disapproved (yellow)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of the classroom-trained cohort (blue bars) with the VR-trained cohort (red bars)

Update of

References

    1. Osterhaus AD, et al. Make science evolve into a One Health approach to improve health and security: a white paper. 2020. pp. 1–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biedron C, et al. Evaluation of infection prevention and control readiness at frontline health care facilities in high-risk districts bordering Ebola virus disease–affected areas in the Democratic Republic of the Congo—Uganda, 2018. 2019. p. 851. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uganda, M.o.H . Uganda National Infection Prevention And Control Guidelines 2013. 2013.
    1. Nyakarahuka L, et al. Ecological niche modeling for filoviruses: a risk map for Ebola and Marburg virus disease outbreaks in Uganda. 2017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The republic of Uganda, M . COVID 19 Daily situation report - 265. 2021. 2021.