Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;35(3):196-201.
doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00572-6. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

Clitoral reconstruction: challenges and new directions

Affiliations
Review

Clitoral reconstruction: challenges and new directions

Michela Villani. Int J Impot Res. 2023 May.

Abstract

Clitoral reconstruction (CR) has been the subject of several studies in recent years, mainly in the medical field. Women with female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) seek clitoral reconstructive surgery to improve their sexual well-being, but also because they are affected by poor self- and body image. CR is supposed to help women with FGM/C reconstruct their sense of self, but the benefits and risks of this surgery have not been sufficiently explored. There are currently no recommendations supporting CR from mainstream medical bodies, and there have been very few ethical studies of the procedure. This article critically discusses the principal studies produced in the medical field and available reflections produced in the social sciences. Through the theoretical frameworks of postcolonial and feminist studies, the article discusses sexuality and pleasure, gender and identity, and race and positionality, with the aim of promoting collaborative work on CR between researchers and social and health professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Abdulcadir J, Margairaz C, Boulvain M, Irion O. Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Medical Weekly; 2011; 10.4414/smw.2010.13137. - PubMed
    1. Rechel B, Mladovsky P, Ingleby D, Mackenbach JP, McKee M. Migration and health in an increasingly diverse Europe. Lancet. 2013;381:1235–45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62086-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans C, Tweheyo R, McGarry J, Eldridge J, Albert J, Nkoyo V, et al. Improving care for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: qualitative systematic reviews. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2019;7. 10.3310/hsdr07310. - PubMed
    1. Nour NM, Michels KB, Bryant AE. Defibulation to treat female genital cutting: effect on symptoms and sexual function. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:55–60. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000224613.72892.77. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andro A, Lesclingand M, Cambois E, Cirbeau C. Volet quantitatif du projet Excision et handicap (ExH): mesure des lésions et traumatismes et évaluation des besoins en chirurgie réparatrice. Paris: Rapport DGS. INED, Université de Paris 1; 2009.