Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;99(7):1976-1983.
doi: 10.1002/ccd.30197. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

Bedside intra-aortic balloon pump insertion in cardiac intensive care unit: A single-center experience

Affiliations

Bedside intra-aortic balloon pump insertion in cardiac intensive care unit: A single-center experience

Luca Baldetti et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU), bedside intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion under echocardiographic guidance may be an attractive option for selected patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Currently available data on this approach are limited.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of bedside IABP insertion, as compared to fluoroscopic-guided insertion in the Catheterization Laboratory (CathLab), and to describe the clinical features of patients receiving bedside IABP insertion using a standardized technique in real-world CICU practice.

Methods: We prospectively evaluated all patients admitted the CICU who received transfemoral IABP between June 2020 and October 2021. The overall study cohort was divided according to implant strategy in bedside and CathLab groups. The primary outcome was correct radiographic IABP positioning at the first bedside chest X-ray obtained after insertion. Secondary outcomes included IABP-related complications.

Results: Among 115 patients, bedside IABP insertion was performed in 35 (30.4%) cases, mainly presenting with CS-related to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) (68.6 vs 33.8%; p < 0.001), with lower LVEF, higher proportion of right ventricular involvement and higher need of inotropes/vasopressors, compared to those receiving CathLab insertion. Bedside IABP insertion resulted feasible and safe, with similar rates of correct IABP positioning (82.9 vs. 82.5%; p = 0.963) and IABP-related major vascular complications (5.7 vs. 5.0%; p = 0.874), as compared to CathLab positioning.

Conclusion: This study suggests the feasibility and safety of bedside IABP insertion, which could be of relevant interest in patients with ADHF-related CS who may not need coronary angiography or other urgent CathLab procedures.

Keywords: IABP; bedside; cardiogenic shock; echocardiography; intra-aortic balloon pump.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intra‐aorticballoon pump bedside insertion operative setting
Figure 2
Figure 2
Transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) views for intra‐aorticballoon pump (IABP) insertion guidance. (A) Off‐axis apical 2‐chamber view demonstrating IABP guidewire (arrow) in the descending aorta. (B) Suprasternal view of the aortic arch confirming appropriate position of the IABP tip (arrows) below the left subclavian artery. (C) Mid‐esophageal long‐axis view (approximately 90°) demonstrating IABP guidewire (arrow) in the descending aorta. (D) Mid‐esophageal orthogonal views (approximately 0° and 90°) of the aortic arch confirming appropriate position of the IABP tip (arrows). Ao, aorta; LCCA, left common carotid artery; LSA, left subclavian artery; LV, left ventricle
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) position assessment on chest X‐ray. (A) correct IABP positioning with the tip (green arrowhead) inside the aortic knob (white circle); (B) incorrect IABP positioning with the tip (red arrowhead) above the aortic knob (white circle); (C) incorrect IABP positioning with the tip (red arrowhead) below the aortic knob (white circle)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Study flow‐chart

References

    1. Jentzer JC, Ahmed AM, Vallabhajosyula S, et al. Shock in the cardiac intensive care unit: changes in epidemiology and prognosis over time. Am Heart J. 2021;232:94‐104. 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.054 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baldetti L, Pagnesi M, Gramegna M, et al. Intra‐aortic balloon pumping in acute decompensated heart failure with hypoperfusion: from pathophysiology to clinical practice. Circ Hear Fail. 2021;14:14. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008527 - DOI - PubMed
    1. den Uil CA, Van Mieghem NM, B Bastos M, et al. Primary intra‐aortic balloon support versus inotropes for decompensated heart failure and low output: a randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 2019;15:586‐593. 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00254 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hernandez‐Montfort J, Sinha SS, Thayer KL, et al. Clinical outcomes associated with acute mechanical circulatory support utilization in heart failure related cardiogenic shock. Circ Hear Fail. 2021;14:e007924. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007924 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kimman JR, Van Mieghem NM, Endeman H, et al. Mechanical support in early cardiogenic shock: what is the role of intra‐aortic balloon counterpulsation? Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020;17:247‐260. 10.1007/s11897-020-00480-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms