Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 1;8(6):871-878.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0476.

Expansion of Cancer Risk Profile for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants

Affiliations

Expansion of Cancer Risk Profile for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants

Yukihide Momozawa et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: The clinical importance of genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers is widely recognized. However, there is insufficient evidence to include other cancer types that are potentially associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in clinical management guidelines.

Objective: To evaluate the association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants with additional cancer types and their clinical characteristics in 100 914 individuals across 14 cancer types.

Design, setting, and participants: This case-control analysis to identify cancer types and clinical characteristics associated with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 included DNA samples and clinical information from 63 828 patients with 14 common cancer types and 37 086 controls that were sourced from a multi-institutional hospital-based registry, BioBank Japan, between April 2003 and March 2018. The data were analyzed between August 2019 and October 2021.

Main outcomes and measures: Germline pathogenic variants in coding regions and 2 bp flanking intronic sequences in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based target sequence method. Associations of (likely) pathogenic variants with each cancer type were assessed by comparing pathogenic variant carrier frequency between patients in each cancer type and controls.

Results: A total of 65 108 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 64.1 [11.6] years; 27 531 [42.3%] female) and 38 153 controls (mean [SD] age at registration, 61.8 [14.6] years; 17 911 [46.9%] female) were included in this study. A total of 315 unique pathogenic variants were identified. Pathogenic variants were associated with P < 1 × 10-4 with an odds ratio (OR) of greater than 4.0 in biliary tract cancer (OR, 17.4; 95% CI, 5.8-51.9) in BRCA1, esophageal cancer (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.9-11.0) in BRCA2, and gastric cancer (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.6-10.5) in BRCA1, and (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1-7.1) in BRCA2 in addition to the 4 established cancer types. We also observed an association with 2 and 4 other cancer types in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. Biliary tract, female breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers showed enrichment of carrier patients according to the increased number of reported cancer types in relatives.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this large-scale registry-based case-control study suggest that pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were associated with the risk of 7 cancer types. These results indicate broader clinical relevance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Momozawa reported grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) during the conduct of the study as well as grants from Ono and personal fees from LabCorp Japan, GK, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. Dr Kamatani reported grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and AMED outside the submitted work as well as honoraria from Astellas, Chugai, Sandoz, Taisho, and Illumina Japan. Dr Kohno reported grants from AMED during the conduct of the study as well as grants from Sysmex and Chugai and personal fees from Eli Lilly outside the submitted work. Dr Murakami reported grants from the Social Cooperation Research Program outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Frequency of Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Across 14 Cancer Types and Controls
Because sex differences in the contribution of pathogenic variants to breast cancer are well known, carrier frequencies in female and male patients were separately described.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Estimated Absolute Risk of the 4 Known Associated Cancer Types
The cumulative risks of each cancer to age 85 years were estimated for carriers and noncarriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Only cancer type gene associations with P < 1 × 10−4 were described. BRCA1+ indicates BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers; BRCA2+, BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers; BRCA1/2, individuals without a BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Estimated Absolute Risk of the 3 Newly Associated Cancer Types
The cumulative risks of each cancer to age 85 years were estimated for carriers and noncarriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Only cancer type gene associations with P < 1 × 10−4 were described. BRCA1+ indicates BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers; BRCA2+, BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers; BRCA1/2, individuals without a BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Armstrong K, Weiner J, Weber B, Asch DA. Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why. Genet Med. 2003;5(2):92-98. doi:10.1097/01.GIM.0000056829.76915.2A - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curtin NJ, Szabo C. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition: past, present and future. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(10):711-736. doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0076-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oh M, Alkhushaym N, Fallatah S, et al. . The association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with prostate cancer risk, frequency, and mortality: a meta-analysis. Prostate. 2019;79(8):880-895. doi:10.1002/pros.23795 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hu C, Hart SN, Polley EC, et al. . Association between inherited germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes and risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA. 2018;319(23):2401-2409. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.6228 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. . Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(22):2091-2102. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1911440 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types