Factors associated with recovery from posttraumatic stress disorder in combat veterans: The role of deployment mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)
- PMID: 35420867
- PMCID: PMC9338889
- DOI: 10.1037/rep0000400
Factors associated with recovery from posttraumatic stress disorder in combat veterans: The role of deployment mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)
Abstract
Objective: Examine factors associated with recovery from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and evaluate the role of deployment mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in the relationship between PTSD recovery and functional outcomes.
Method: Post 9/11 combat veterans with lifetime history of PTSD (N = 124, 84.7% male) completed the Mid-Atlantic MIRECC Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury (MMA-TBI), Salisbury Blast Interview (SBI), Clinician Administered PTSD scale (CAPS-5), cognitive assessment battery, and measures of depression, PTSD symptoms, neurobehavioral symptoms, sleep quality, pain interference, and quality of life.
Results: Analyses of variance (ANOVA) results revealed significant differences in most behavioral health outcomes based on PTSD recovery, with participants who have recovered from PTSD showing less severe neurobehavioral and depressive symptoms, better sleep quality, less functional pain interference, and higher quality of life. No differences were found in cognitive functioning between those who have recovered from PTSD and those who have not. History of deployment mTBI did not significantly moderate the relationship between PTSD recovery and most functional and cognitive outcomes with the exception of 2 measures of processing speed. Specifically, among participants with history of deployment mTBI, those who have recovered from PTSD displayed better cognitive functioning than those who have not. Additionally, participants who have not recovered from PTSD had higher levels of blast exposure during military service.
Conclusions: PTSD recovery was associated with better psychological functioning and higher quality of life, but not with objective cognitive functioning. Deployment mTBI history moderated only the relationship between PTSD recovery status and tests of processing speed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose. This work was supported by grant funding from the Department of Defense, Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC) Award W81XWH-13-2-0095 and Department of Veterans Affairs CENC Award I01 CX001135. This work was also supported by resources of the Research & Academic Affairs Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), and Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowship Program in Mental Illness, Research, and Treatment (MIRT).
Figures


References
-
- Benjamini Y, & Hochberg Y (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57(1), 289–300.
-
- Benton AI, & Hamsher K (1989). Multilingual aphasia examination. AJA Associates.
-
- Birkeland MS, Nielsen MB, Hansen MB, Knardahl S, & Heir T (2017). Like a bridge over troubled water? A longitudinal study of general social support, colleague support, and leader support as recovery factors after a traumatic event. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8(1), 1–10. 10.1080/20008198.2017.1302692 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous