Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 14;9(1):34.
doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00462-2.

Revision total knee replacement case-mix at a major revision centre

Shiraz A Sabah  1   2 , Lennart von Fritsch  3 , Tanvir Khan  4 , Alexander D Shearman  4 , Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran  4 ; Oxford Revision Arthroplasty Group; David J Beard  3 , Andrew J Price  3   4 , Abtin Alvand  3   4
Collaborators, Affiliations

Revision total knee replacement case-mix at a major revision centre

Shiraz A Sabah et al. J Exp Orthop. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One or more authors have received Speakers Bureau fees from Zimmer Biomet, Medacta International, and DePuy Synthes. No company had any role in the design, conduct or reporting of this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Bar chart demonstrating the numbers of first revision, second revision and third or more revision TKR procedure performed in the major revision centre over the study period. b Tabplot’ demonstrating the indications for revision TKR. Column percentages are presented for first and subsequent revision procedures and sum vertically to 100%. Prosthetic joint infection was the most prevalent indication for revision, accounting for 83.8% of fourth or more revision procedures
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bar-charts demonstrating referral sources to the major revision centre for first and subsequent revision procedures. 140/288 (48.6%) of patients were referred to the MRC after their first revision procedure. PAU Primary arthroplasty unit, RU Revision unit, MRC Major revision centre
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flowchart demonstrating the technical details of revision TKR procedures performed over the study period. [Footnotes – DAIR debridement, antibiotics and implant retention, TKR total knee replacement, UKR unicompartmental knee replacement]
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Histogram demonstrating length of hospital stay following rTKR. b Cumulative probability of hospital discharge by length of stay and complexity of rTKR (rated according to RKCC as ‘less complex’, ‘complex’ or ‘most complex’)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sabah SA, Alvand A, Price AJ. Revision knee replacement for prosthetic joint infection: Epidemiology, clinical outcomes and health-economic considerations. Knee. 2021;28:417–421. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.12.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sabah SA, Lim CT, Middleton R, von Fritsch L, Bottomley N, Jackson WFM, Price AJ, Alvand A. Management of aseptic failure of the mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2020;27:1721–1728. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sabah SA, Alvand A, Knight R, Beard DJ, Price AJ. Patient-Reported Function and Quality of Life After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 10,727 Patients from the NHS PROMs Program. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(8):2887–2895.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bloch B, James P, Phillips JRA. Clinical networking in revision knee replacement. The Knee Elsevier. 2020;27:1690–1692. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.07.082. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Briggs T. A national review of adult elective orthopaedic services in England: Getting It Right First Time. British Orthopaedic Association; 2015. p. 68.