Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;64(6):989-1006.
doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100166. Epub 2022 Apr 15.

Optimization of adaptive designs with respect to a performance score

Affiliations

Optimization of adaptive designs with respect to a performance score

Carolin Herrmann et al. Biom J. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Adaptive designs are an increasingly popular method for the adaptation of design aspects in clinical trials, such as the sample size. Scoring different adaptive designs helps to make an appropriate choice among the numerous existing adaptive design methods. Several scores have been proposed to evaluate adaptive designs. Moreover, it is possible to determine optimal two-stage adaptive designs with respect to a customized objective score by solving a constrained optimization problem. In this paper, we use the conditional performance score by Herrmann et al. (2020) as the optimization criterion to derive optimal adaptive two-stage designs. We investigate variations of the original performance score, for example, by assigning different weights to the score components and by incorporating prior assumptions on the effect size. We further investigate a setting where the optimization framework is extended by a global power constraint, and additional optimization of the critical value function next to the stage-two sample size is performed. Those evaluations with respect to the sample size curves and the resulting design's performance can contribute to facilitate the score's usage in practice.

Keywords: adaptive design; clinical trial; optimal design; performance score; sample size calculation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bartroff, J., & Lai, T. L. (2008). Efficient adaptive designs with mid-course sample size adjustment in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 1593-1611.
    1. Bauer, P., Bretz, F., Dragalin, V., König, F., & Wassmer, G. (2016). Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: Opportunities and pitfalls. Statistics in Medicine, 35, 325-347.
    1. Bauer, P., & Köhne, K. (1994). Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. Biometrics, 50, 1029-1041.
    1. Bauer, P., & König, F. (2006). The reassessment of trial perspectives from interim data-A critical view. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 23-36.
    1. Brannath, W., & Bauer, P. (2004). Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power. Biometrics, 60, 715-723.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources