Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2022 May 17;56(10):6786-6787.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00524. Epub 2022 Apr 15.

Comment on "Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities"

Jan G Kunnas  1
Affiliations
Comment

Comment on "Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities"

Jan G Kunnas. Environ Sci Technol. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no competing financial interest.

Comment in

Comment on

  • Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities.
    Persson L, Carney Almroth BM, Collins CD, Cornell S, de Wit CA, Diamond ML, Fantke P, Hassellöv M, MacLeod M, Ryberg MW, Søgaard Jørgensen P, Villarrubia-Gómez P, Wang Z, Hauschild MZ. Persson L, et al. Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;56(3):1510-1521. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. Epub 2022 Jan 18. Environ Sci Technol. 2022. PMID: 35038861 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Persson L.; Carney A.; Bethanie M.; Collins C. D.; Cornell S.; de Wit C. A.; Diamond M. L.; Fantke P.; Hassellöv M.; MacLeod M.; Ryberg M. W.; Søgaard Jørgensen P.; Villarrubia-Gómez P.; Wang Z.; Hauschild M. Z. Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56 (3), 1510–1521. 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plass G.Carbon Dioxide and the Climate. American Scientist; 1956. ( (44), ), 302–316;.
    2. Revelle R.; Suess H. Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and ocean, and the question of an increase of atmospheric CO2 during the past decade. Tellus 1957, 9 (18), 18–27. 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01849.x. - DOI
    3. Kunnas J.How to Proceed After Copenhagen. Electronic Green Journal 20111 ( (31), ); https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bf2k0dz.10.5070/G313110845 - DOI
    1. Wang Z.; Walker G. W.; Muir D. C. G.; Nagatani-Yoshida K. Toward a Global Understanding of Chemical Pollution: A First Comprehensive Analysis of National and Regional Chemical Inventories. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (5), 2575–2584. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06379. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GESAMP . Sources, Fate and Effects of Microplastics in the Marine Environment: Part 2 of a Global Assessment. Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection. Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 93. 2016.
    1. Ecetoc, High information content technologies in support of read-across in chemical risk assessment, Technical Report No. 109, 2010; https://www.ecetoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ECETOC-TR-109-High-inf....

MeSH terms