Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 20;41(16):3164-3179.
doi: 10.1002/sim.9410. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

Subgroup-specific dose finding for phase I-II trials using Bayesian clustering

Affiliations

Subgroup-specific dose finding for phase I-II trials using Bayesian clustering

Alexandra Curtis et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

In most models and algorithms for dose-finding clinical trials, it is assumed that the trial participants are homogeneous-the optimal dose is the same for all those who qualify for the trial. However, if there are heterogeneous populations who may benefit from the same treatment, it is inefficient to conduct dose-finding separately for each group, and assuming homogeneity across all subpopulations may lead to identification of the incorrect dose for some (or all) subgroups. To accommodate heterogeneity in dose-finding trials when both efficacy and toxicity outcomes must be used to identify the optimal dose (as in immunotherapeutic oncology treatments), we utilize an adaptive Bayesian clustering method which borrows strength among similar subgroups and clusters truly homogeneous subgroups. Unlike methodology already described in the literature, our proposed methodology does not require the assumption of exchangeability between subgroups or a priori ordering of subgroups, but does allow for specification of different subgroup-specific priors if prior information is available. We provide a comparison of operating characteristics between our method and Bayesian hierarchical models for subgroups in a variety of relevant scenarios. After simulation studies with four a priori subgroups, we observed that our method and the hierarchical models both outperform separate subgroup-specific models when all subgroups have the same dose-efficacy and dose-toxicity curves. However, our method outperforms hierarchical models when one subgroup has a different dose-efficacy or dose-toxicity curve from the other three subgroups.

Keywords: Bayesian model averaging; dose-finding clinical trial; spike-and-slab prior; subgroup.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Simulation Scenarios. Each line represents the true probability of efficacy (solid line) or toxicity (dashed line) for some or all of the four subgroups. The number of the subgroup(s) which the line represents (1 through 4) is provided at the right hand side of each plot. In the homogeneous scenarios, the lines provided represent the true probability of efficacy and toxicity for all subgroups. If a square is plotted at a particular dose, it indicates that dose is acceptable for that subgroup. If the square is filled in, that dose is the optimal dose (ie, has the highest utility value) for that subgroup.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Le Tourneau C, Dieras V, Tresca P, Cacheux W, Paoletti X. Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents. Target Oncol. 2010;5:65‐72. - PubMed
    1. O'Quigley J, Paoletti X. Continual reassessment method for ordered groups. Biometrics. 2003;59(2):430‐440. - PubMed
    1. Wages NA, Read PW, Petroni GR. A phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial. Pharm Stat. 2015;14(4):302‐310. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunanan KM, Koopmeiners JS. Hierarchical models for sharing information across populations in phase I dose‐escalation studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(11):3447‐3459. - PubMed
    1. Cunanan KM, Koopmeiners JS. Efficacy/toxicity dose‐finding using hierarchical modeling for multiple populations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;71:162‐172. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources