Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 16;18(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00525-9.

The fading popularity of a local ecological calendar from Brunei Darussalam, Borneo

Affiliations

The fading popularity of a local ecological calendar from Brunei Darussalam, Borneo

Nurzahidah Bakar et al. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. .

Abstract

Background: Local ecological calendars are ecocultural frameworks that link temporal and spatial scales, contributing to resilience and adaptive management of natural resources and landscapes. They also facilitate management, access and withdrawal of provisioning ecosystem services. In this article, we describe how the ecological calendar of the Kedayan people of Brunei Darussalam links skyscape and biodiversity with sociocultural aspirations to foster adaptive management of landscape, and provide an understanding of the transmission of calendric knowledge in the community.

Methods: In 2018, we collaborated with sixteen purposively sampled knowledge keepers from the Kedayan community of Brunei Darussalam to document the Kedayan local ecological calendar, and develop a calendrical pictogram. Using a structured questionnaire, we then interviewed 107 randomly selected community members, to understand the contemporary relevance and popularity of the Kedayan calendar, and the transmission of calendric knowledge in the community.

Results: Our findings reveal that very few respondents (n = 27, 25.3%) are aware of the existence of Kedayan ecological calendar; majority (n = 80, 74.7%) were not aware of its existence. There is no statistically significant correlation between consulting healers, knowledge on appropriate time requisite to consult healers, and awareness and self-professed knowledge of Kedayan calendar. Only 14 (13.1%) of the respondents reported to have received some form of calendric knowledge, while the majority (86.9%; n = 93) never received any calendric knowledge. Only a negligible 1.9% reported to have transmitted calendric knowledge to others indicating a breakdown in transmission of calendric knowledge.

Conclusion: The calendric pictogram would help the community in revitalizing their calendar. However, the community will have to invest on enhancing transmission of calendric knowledge.

Keywords: Calendar keeper; Ecosystem services; Indigenous calendar; Landscape management; Phenological knowledge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map showing localities where interviews with knowledge keepers were conducted
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map of Mukim Sengkurong showing localities where respondents were interviewed using structured questionnaire
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pictogram of Kedayan dynamic local ecological calendar. Photograph sources: Joremy Tony (Emerald Dove), CC-BY-SA-4.0 Rejaul Karim (Indian Cuckoo), Nurzahidah Bakar (All others). Note: Names of months are in Kedayan/Bahasa Melayu
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Community members from whom calendric information was received. Note: The chart shows that no members had received knowledge from a knowledge keeper outside their family
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Schematic representation of activities facilitated by the Kedayan ecological calendar

References

    1. Maxwell ARJ. The place of the Kadayan in Traditional Brunei Society. South East Asia Res. 1996;4:157–196. doi: 10.1177/0967828X9600400204. - DOI
    1. Maxwell ARJ. Urang Darat, an ethnographic study of the Kadayan of Labu valley. Brunei: Yale University; 1981.
    1. Druce SC. A comparative analysis of the Brunei origin tradition with the wider Austronesian world. Origins, history and social structure in Brunei Darussalam. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge, 2021. |: Routledge; 2020. p. 42–56.
    1. Moody D. The Malayic language family. In: King J, King W, editors. Languages of Sabah: a survey report. Canberra: Australian National University; 1984. pp. 91–100.
    1. Sharbawi S. Reevaluating rhoticity in Brunei English: the case of the Kedayan. Southeast Asia A Multidiscip J. 2018;18:22–37.

LinkOut - more resources