Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun;36(6):1451-1466.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01561-w. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

The complex karyotype in hematological malignancies: a comprehensive overview by the Francophone Group of Hematological Cytogenetics (GFCH)

Affiliations
Review

The complex karyotype in hematological malignancies: a comprehensive overview by the Francophone Group of Hematological Cytogenetics (GFCH)

F Nguyen-Khac et al. Leukemia. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Karyotype complexity has major prognostic value in many malignancies. There is no consensus on the definition of a complex karyotype, and the prognostic impact of karyotype complexity differs from one disease to another. Due to the importance of the complex karyotype in the prognosis and treatment of several hematological diseases, the Francophone Group of Hematological Cytogenetics (Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique, GFCH) has developed an up-to-date, practical document for helping cytogeneticists to assess complex karyotypes in these hematological disorders. The evaluation of karyotype complexity is challenging, and it would be useful to have a consensus method for counting the number of chromosomal abnormalities (CAs). Although it is not possible to establish a single prognostic threshold for the number of CAs in all malignancies, a specific consensus prognostic cut-off must be defined for each individual disease. In order to standardize current cytogenetic practices and apply a single denomination, we suggest defining a low complex karyotype as having 3 CAs, an intermediate complex karyotype as having 4 CAs, and a highly complex karyotype as having 5 or more CAs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Berger R, Bernheim A, Daniel MT, Valensi F, Flandrin G. Induced leukemias. Cytogenetical and cytological aspects. Comparison with primitive leukemias (author’s transl). Nouv Rev Fr Hematol. 1981;23:275–84. - PubMed
    1. Juliusson G, Robèrt KH, Ost A, Friberg K, Biberfeld P, Nilsson B, et al. Prognostic information from cytogenetic analysis in chronic B-lymphocytic leukemia and leukemic immunocytoma. Blood 1985;65:134–41. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Yunis JJ, Rydell RE, Oken MM, Arnesen MA, Mayer MG, Lobell M. Refined chromosome analysis as an independent prognostic indicator in de novo myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 1986;67:1721–30. - PubMed - DOI
    1. McGowan-Jordan J, Hastings, Ros J, Moore, Sarah. ISCN 2020 | Karger Book [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 8]. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Book/Home/279152
    1. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Solé F, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2012;120:2454–65. - PubMed - PMC - DOI